Paul Eggert eggert@cs.ucla.edu writes:
Thanks. This seems to be a win regardless of whether it fixes the nettle problems,
Dago, can you test if it solves the SunOS-5.9 problem for you? I.e., apply Paul's patch to gnutls/gnulib, then *unapply* the nettle workaround I comitted yesterday, and see if you still get compilation errors related to nettle-stdint.h.
I'm not sure how picky the compiler is about multiple but equivalent typedefs of the same name.
Regards, /Niels
Hi Niels,
Am 08.05.2012 um 10:55 schrieb Niels Möller:
Paul Eggert eggert@cs.ucla.edu writes:
Thanks. This seems to be a win regardless of whether it fixes the nettle problems,
Dago, can you test if it solves the SunOS-5.9 problem for you? I.e., apply Paul's patch to gnutls/gnulib, then *unapply* the nettle workaround I comitted yesterday, and see if you still get compilation errors related to nettle-stdint.h.
I'm not sure how picky the compiler is about multiple but equivalent typedefs of the same name.
If Paul or you could provide a bootstrapped tarball I'll be happy to test it as I am not really familiar with gnulib bootstrapping.
Best regards
-- Dago
Dagobert Michelsen dam@opencsw.org writes:
If Paul or you could provide a bootstrapped tarball I'll be happy to test it as I am not really familiar with gnulib bootstrapping.
I'm also not very familiar with gnulib.
But I think it should work fine to just get the gnutls release and apply Paul's patch to the file gnutls-3.0.9/gl/stdint.in.h before running the configure script.
Regards, /Niels
nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se