30 May
2016
30 May
'16
11:14 p.m.
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Niels Möller nisse@lysator.liu.se wrote:
Aaron Boxer boxerab@gmail.com writes:
For KM_prng.cpp , are you suggesting that I use 128 bit AES instead of
256
bit ? I think the original code used 256 bit.
I might have misread the code. If the original code used 256-bit aes, always, you should use nettle's aes256_ctx when porting it over.
Niels, you were right, the code does use 128 bit encryption.
Thanks so much, Aaron