Re: developing nettle with git

On 03/28/2011 09:07 AM, Niels Möller wrote:

Maybe it makes things simpler to stick to a single repository for everything (like the current cvs repository)? Is there any compelling reason why nettle must be a separate repository? (If I understand the docs correctly, one could split off a nettle repository later, using git-subtree split).

I'd personally like to work on nettle without dealing with the entire source of lsh and the other components.

I suspect the same might be true of people who want to hack on the other components, or on lsh itself.

If you want to encourage external participation, separate repositories make more sense to me.

How do other folks on this list feel about the tradeoffs here?

--dkg