Simon Josefsson simon@josefsson.org writes:
fre 2012-11-30 klockan 12:38 +0100 skrev Niels Möller:
I think I'd still like to do the header split, sha.h -> sha1.h and sha2.h, for better consistency within Nettle, but that's less intrusive, and backwards compatibility is trivial, with a sha.h including both.
Yes, doing that split makes sense to me. SHA256 etc doesn't have much in common with SHA1, so they belong in separate header files.
I did that split the other day.
And while updating hash documentation, I also reorganized that section of the manual a bit.
Regards, /Niels