16 Apr
2011
16 Apr
'11
8:39 a.m.
nisse@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmav@gnutls.org writes:
Would this mean that nettle is now compatible with the libgcrypt version of serpent?
That's the idea.
In that case would the LGPL libgcrypt code be used instead?
Simon said he was working on that. I don't know current status, so I figured it was good to fix the old Nettle code too (it turned out to be easy).
I'll resume my work -- I recall that I got it to a stage where it built and generated ciphertext, however it didn't match the test vectors that were in Nettle back then. Hopefully it will match now, and I can submit the patch shortly.
/Simon