8 May
2013
8 May
'13
8:12 a.m.
Martin Storsjö martin@martin.st writes:
I wouldn't suggest moving away from the unified syntax - being able to build for both thumb and arm from the same source is useful.
Ok, if that is useful, I guess we should move in the opposite direction and use it for *all* arm assembly files. But I'm worrying that the same old assemblers which barf on
orr r4,r8,lsl#8
may also barf on the itee instruction which is required for conditional execution in unified syntax. Except possibly conditional branches, I don't remember. Could of course use some configure/m4 magic to get around that, if we think it's worth the effort.
Regards, /Niels
--
Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26.
Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.