29 Mar
2011
29 Mar
'11
8:03 a.m.
On 03/28/2011 07:47 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 03/28/2011 09:07 AM, Niels Möller wrote:
Maybe it makes things simpler to stick to a single repository for everything (like the current cvs repository)? Is there any compelling reason why nettle must be a separate repository? (If I understand the docs correctly, one could split off a nettle repository later, using git-subtree split).
I'd personally like to work on nettle without dealing with the entire source of lsh and the other components.
That is the case with me as well. Moreover requiring someone to checkout a different project to access nettle, just gives the impression that the library is not intended for general use, but is rather an internal library of that project.
regards, Nikos