7 Feb
2011
7 Feb
'11
11:21 a.m.
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmav@gnutls.org writes:
I would like less of the internals of gcm exposed to the user rather than more. As a user of nettle I wouldn't even want to know that there is a hash subkey on gcm.
In any case we should probably have a gcm_aes interface (and whatever other variants are relevant) that is easier to use than the lowest level gcm interface.
Regards, /Niels
--
Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26.
Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.