I posted a performance test here https://lists.lysator.liu.se/pipermail/nettle-bugs/2020/009169.html Personally, I prefer keeping the altivec version in nettle library since it's faster than C implementation but I'm not sure whether the performance margin fits with the library's convention of optimizing such functions.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:40 AM Amos Jeffries squid3@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 28/09/20 8:25 am, Maamoun TK wrote:
gcm_fill() got C optimization which performs close to the one I
What do you mean by "close"? faster or slower? and it that difference consistent?
If the other implementation is slower (even by a few nanosec) it can be useful keeping this fast code around for builds where high-performance is critical.
AYJ _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs