15 Apr
2011
15 Apr
'11
7:50 p.m.
On 04/15/2011 09:13 PM, Niels Möller wrote:
[...]
I've now reverted this old change, which means that from now on serpent in Nettle ought to agree with other implementations. And this naturally also breaks compatibility for anyone using the serpent implementation of all (or almost all) earlier versions of Nettle.
Would this mean that nettle is now compatible with the libgcrypt version of serpent? In that case would the LGPL libgcrypt code be used instead?
regards, Nikos