On 08/27/2011 09:05 PM, Niels Möller wrote:
> Are any other variants of ripemd in use? (According to wikipedia,
> there's original ripemd, ripemd-128, ripend-160, ripemd-256 and
> ripemd-320, but I have no idea which of them are in use today or are
> likely to be used in the future).
ripemd and ripemd-128 are considered broken. I don't know if ripemd-x,
x>=256 have been used anywhere. Having the SHA-3 winner instead would be
a much better choice.
regards,
Nikos