Alison wrote:
>What if the very simplicity
>or indeed amateurishness of a piece of fanfiction (its cheekiness if you
>like) is part of its message. That's pretty challenging and interesting in
>itself.
I agree in principle this is possible, but can't think of a fanfic example
offhand (perhaps you can provide?) where 'amateurishness' was (IMO)
anything other than a partial failure of the writer's skills to carry the
plot/message. (That might sound fairly unkind, but I'd include all of my
own fiction writing in that heap, and I wouldn't necessarily consider it
other than a compliment -- better to have tried to pull off something
complex and only 60% succeeded than to have attempted something easy and
95% succeeded, or indeed to have sat and carped on the sidelines...)
The other aspect of amateurishness in fanzines, of course, is the
production side. I've heard more than one B7 fan praise zines with very
amateur production techniques (one hesitates to say 'poorly produced')
precisely for the amateurish look. Personally, I like them both ways --
ttba was an attempt to produce a nice-looking zine without it ever leaving
my back-bedroom-cum-home-office, while my favourite-ever B7 zine (Stadler
Link) had a fairly amateur look to it before ever I spilled coffee on my
copy....
>If it is just a bloody noise that you would rather not listen to, it is
more
>likely to repel people, make them prefer commercial products.
Or indeed amateur products in a different genre. For what it's worth, I'd
rate a lot of fanfiction as at least as high quality as a lot of commercial
fiction.
>I think in
>that respect fanfic is more successful than punk, because it is more
>consistently enjoyed, and has avoided selling out.
I'm not convinced fanfiction can ever 'sell out' -- its very existence
implies interacting with the source series in a fashion other than the
bland consumer that the producers probably envisaged.
Tavia