In a message dated 2/17/01 2:35:52 PM Eastern Standard Time,
dshilling(a)worldnet.att.net writes:
<< But I'd say, au contraire, it's an enjoyable corporate extension of a
media property--it would be a monument to a fandom if it was in
somebody's basement in Peoria and she spent 10 years putting it
together, or whatever. <<
Ah, but if it weren't for the ST fans, there would be no corporate extension,
no ongoing property, no *industry* of STAR TREK, much less a steady stream of
devotees who slap down money every day to enjoy this incredible attraction in
Las Vegas. They would never bother. If there were no fandom, there would have
been no ST beyond the reruns.
>> I watched my first B7 tape because of Jenkins,
and I still think he's right--fandom is the assertion that the real
story of the show belongs to the people who love it, not the people
who (by a mere technicality) happen to have a TV studio. >>
No argument about that from me. I am, however, currently conducting a debate
about that point with a couple of the writers who worked on HIGHLANDER, over
at alt.tv.Highlander. They insist that the opinion of the fans is irrelevant,
and that we ought never be polled about what we want to see on a show in that
universe. Sure. What do *we* know? As far as the professional producers, cast
and staff are concerned, we're lucky they're doing anything for us at all. I
suspect the same applies to the staff and crew of most series. That we'd
better like what they do, because they know best.
Leah