I was watching Killer again (the pain, the pain:-)) and got to thinking about the fact that Robert Holmes, who wrote this, Gambit and Orbit, was offered the script editor's job ahead of Chris Boucher. And I do have to say I think we were lucky he turned it down.
Don't get me wrong - I enjoy all three episodes, and absolutely *love* Killer, which I do think is the strongest, scriptwise, of the three. It's got its problems, but the contrasting Avon/Tynus and Blake/Bellfriar interactions are very appealing. Gambit suffers from extreme unevenness, with the Travis/Servalan/Krantor line getting all the attention and the Blake/Jenna/Cally/Docholli one being seriously starved of oxygen or interest, but its cleverness and the sheer style with which it was put together carry it through; Orbit is better than average fun, but IMO only gets its classic status because of that lethal kick in the last ten minutes.
But some of the things that are common to all three episodes would IMO actually harm the show as a whole if (as Boucher was) he was re-writing whole slabs of the thing.
For instance, he really does have a penchant for exposition, his quite complex plots (for TV action-adventure, okay?) involving quite blatant 'let's stop and let character A tell character B what the audience has to know' scenes (Blake and Bellfriar in Killer, Servalan and Jarriere in Killer). These can be very entertaining (I never like Servalan *more* than when she's trying to keep her temper with My Favourite Gnome) but they're not exactly subtle.
The main problem I have with his scripts is that, while he writes terrific Avon-Vila, good Travis, and wonderfully memorable guest characters (Jarriere, Krantor & Toise, Bellfriar, Tynus & Gambrill, Egrorian) he shows almost no interest *at all* in the rest of the crew (except Blake in Killer. But *only* in Killer.) Jenna (a bimbette in both of his S2 scripts) Cally (pure wallpaper) and the Scorpio youngsters are barely acknowledged.
Maybe it's unfair to compare, since CB wrote more scripts, but I have noticed that oft-mentioned favourites by him include those episodes - especially Shadow, Star One and DeathWatch - in which *all* of the crew get a goodly share of the action; Boucher had his favourites (and has freely acknowledged that Avon was No 1 :-)) but wrote well for *all* of the crew. Holmes episodes tend to be 'Blake's Two, Not Including Blake' ... would this, do you think, have bled over if he were overseeing the whole series? (I hate to think how his blatant disinterest in the Blake-Avon relationship might have affected the whole Star One crescendo, *especially* the episode itself).
Anyone like to throw some thoughts on either scriptwriter? Or maybe muse on how one of the other writers *might* have gone in the role? (Let no one mention Ben Stee ...)
_________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--- Sally wrote:
I was watching Killer again (the pain, the pain:-)) and got to thinking about the fact that Robert Holmes, who wrote this, Gambit and Orbit, was offered the script editor's job ahead of Chris Boucher. And I do have to say I think we were lucky he turned it down.
I don't know. His stint at Dr Who was IMO the best in the programmes history. On the other hand I don't know if the Gothic feel he gave the programme would have translated well across to Blake's 7.
Don't get me wrong - I enjoy all three episodes, and absolutely *love* Killer, which I do think is the strongest, scriptwise, of the three. It's got its problems, but the contrasting Avon/Tynus and Blake/Bellfriar interactions are very appealing.
I always think that Killer is a Dr Who script that got put in the wrong in tray. Curly haired Bloke with all the answers swans into a futuristic environment menaced by human corpses animated by sinister alien invaders. Meanwhile a couple of loveable rogues are attempting to pull off a scam. The only difference is that the female companions stay in the TARDIS er.. Liberator and it doesn't all get neatly wrapped up at the end. I put the fact that Jenna becomes exposition fodder, losing her status as an expert on Space Flight, is because Holmes confused her with Sarah Jenna, er Jane, Smith.
Gambit suffers from extreme unevenness, with the Travis/Servalan/Krantor line getting all the attention and the Blake/Jenna/Cally/Docholli one being seriously starved of oxygen or interest, but its cleverness and the sheer style with which it was put together carry it through;
I think that Holmes was interested in the Duel of the memorable grotesques - I think he always managed to write Servalan well, which contrasts with his treatment of the female regulars. The search for Star One doesn't seem to have grabbed him. And of course the loveable rogues come off well. In the alternate universe where Holmes took the job I don't think we'd have got anything as good as the ending to season 2. No Star One, no Jenna betraying Blake, no Avon agreeing to hold off the bad guys until the bad guys arrive, no speeches about wading in blood.
Orbit is better than average fun, but IMO only gets its classic status because of that lethal kick in the last ten minutes.
I agree. I like Egrorian and Pindar. I think that Egrorian grovelling on his knees to Servalan is one of the highlights of Season 4. But it would have been your common or garden run around without the shuttle scenes. And by the end of S4 we all knew, the moment we saw the omnipotent Galaxian's console that our heroes hadn't a cat in hells chance of getting hold of it.
The main problem I have with his scripts is that, while he writes terrific Avon-Vila, good Travis, and wonderfully memorable guest characters (Jarriere, Krantor & Toise, Bellfriar, Tynus & Gambrill, Egrorian) he shows almost no interest *at all* in the rest of the crew (except Blake in Killer. But *only* in Killer.) Jenna (a bimbette in both of his S2 scripts) Cally (pure wallpaper) and the Scorpio youngsters are barely acknowledged.
Ah you have neglected Tarrant and Dayna in Traitor. But come to think of it Traitor is the story of Space Major Hunda and his gallant band of rebels fighting a doomed struggle against Servalan and a one eyed baddie. Tarrant and Dayna are, if not ciphers, almost incidental to the plot. (Dr Who fans - compare and contrast with Caves of Androzani). If Holmes had been allowed to create the show from scratch I think we'd have got something brilliant - not B7 but brilliant nonetheless. As it was if characters didn't interest him he cheerfully sidelined them and introduced his own gallery of memorable guest characters who certainly added to the richness of B7. But it's a bit frustrating if you like Jenna, Cally, Soolin or Blake to see them relegated to the sidelines.
Maybe it's unfair to compare, since CB wrote more scripts, but I have noticed that oft-mentioned favourites by him include those episodes - especially Shadow, Star One and DeathWatch - in which *all* of the crew get a goodly share of the action; Boucher had his favourites (and has freely acknowledged that Avon was No 1 :-)) but wrote well for *all* of the crew. Holmes episodes tend to be 'Blake's Two, Not Including Blake' ... would this, do you think, have bled over if he were overseeing the whole series? (I hate to think how his blatant disinterest in the Blake-Avon relationship might have affected the whole Star One crescendo, *especially* the episode itself).
Oh, Boucher and Nation made B7 IMO. If anyone else had done it we'd have got the same names but a different (and in most cases I can think of, inferior) product. If Holmes had taken over in the way Boucher did in S2 we'd have got Avon and Vila pulling of scams and getting into scrapes which is fun but not the same. It's a shame that Holmes didn't contribute in S3 as the nature of that season would have allowed for the sort of thing he liked to add in a way that S2 didn't.
Anyone like to throw some thoughts on either scriptwriter? Or maybe muse on how one of the other writers *might* have gone in the role? (Let no one mention Ben Stee ...)
Other Script Editors:
Terry Nation: Would have kept Blake as a much less ambiguous hero. The Andromedans would have travelled around in shiny pepperpots (Mark 3 travel machines) and said "exterminate" a lot. Allan Prior: All the episodes would have had plot holes you could drive a coach and horses through. Ben Steed: Wake up and smell the testosterone, Dayna would have been the only woman to do anything in 52 episodes. Avon would have pulled everyone out of the soup in 52 episodes. Jarvik would have been the new Travis. Tanith Lee: Much more sexual tension among the Liberator crew. Mystical villain(ess) of the week would have taken over from the mad scientists. Roger Parkes: Blake's 7 fans would not mention the dialogue as one of the high points of the show. Rod Beacham: It would have been great fun, but very shallow fun.
Stephen.
____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:52:53PM +0100, Stephen Date wrote:
Oh, Boucher and Nation made B7 IMO. If anyone else had done it we'd have got the same names but a different (and in most cases I can think of, inferior) product.
Other Script Editors:
Terry Nation: Would have kept Blake as a much less ambiguous hero. The Andromedans would have travelled around in shiny pepperpots (Mark 3 travel machines) and said "exterminate" a lot.
This reminds me of a quote from Flanders & Swann... "... satire squats, hoof in mouth, under every bush. The job of satire is to strip off the veneer of comforting illusion and cosy half-truth. Our job, as I see it, is to put it back again."
The reason B7 worked so well is because you had the mixture. Boucher was like Satire -- stripping off illusions and painting everything shades of grey. Nation was "putting it back again" -- giving us noble heros and bad baddies. The synergy between the two gave us that adorable alchemy of flawed heros.
Kathryn Andersen -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Timbo: If I was going to misspell something, I could do it ten times better than Tony can. (07-06-88)
From: Stephen Date stephend999@yahoo.co.uk
If Holmes had been allowed to create the show from scratch I think we'd have got something brilliant - not B7 but brilliant nonetheless. As it was if characters didn't interest him he cheerfully sidelined them and introduced his own gallery of memorable guest characters who certainly added to the richness of B7.
Definitely. In compiling the Sevencyclopaedia, I soon learned that a Holmes ep was going to bump up the entry count. Of all the writers for the series, he was the one who cared most about a depth and richness of background, locating his characters in a vibrant galactic community. Background resonates through his scripts - Leedenbrank, Belhangria University, B-19 cruisers, Trantinians (and the odd clunker like Vitazade). Holmes' characters inhabit a universe, rather than just appear in a script. He should have been taken on as background continuity editor.
Neil
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Neil Faulkner wrote:
Definitely. In compiling the Sevencyclopaedia, I soon learned that a Holmes ep was going to bump up the entry count. Of all the writers for the series, he was the one who cared most about a depth and richness of background, locating his characters in a vibrant galactic community. Background resonates through his scripts - Leedenbrank, Belhangria University, B-19 cruisers, Trantinians (and the odd clunker like Vitazade). Holmes' characters inhabit a universe, rather than just appear in a script. He should have been taken on as background continuity editor.
I'm not sure I agree. I don't think he spent much time figuring out the inner workings of a fictional universe. Rather, he was awfully good at coming up with names and turns of phrase which suggested a rich and complex universe -- which is all you need to do, really.
Iain
Sally Manton wrote:
Orbit is better than average fun, but IMO only gets its classic status because of that lethal kick in the last ten minutes.
Surely that's the whole point? All the rest is comedic misdirection. Unfortunately, it only carries the full punch the first time, which is why I never show it to anyone who hasn't watched the whole thing up to that point.
The main problem I have with his scripts is that, while he writes terrific Avon-Vila, good Travis, and wonderfully memorable guest characters (Jarriere, Krantor & Toise, Bellfriar, Tynus & Gambrill, Egrorian) he shows almost no interest *at all* in the rest of the crew (except Blake in Killer. But *only* in Killer.) Jenna (a bimbette in both of his S2 scripts) Cally (pure wallpaper) and the Scorpio youngsters are barely acknowledged.
The Jenna thing is annoying, but I would put up with the rest for the lovely A-V, and for the guest characters - of course I *adore* Jarriere, and like Bellfriar very much. Krantor and Toise are okay, too. Also, I find the Tynus-Avon-Vila interaction in Killer to be crucial to my concept of Avon and also A-V. I wish Holmes had written more episodes, but then again, I'm a Killer junkie and probably need a 12-step program. (Seriously. Why do I watch Killer more than Shadow, when I *know* Shadow is the better ep, and love it, too? Unless it's the A-V in Killer, and the rotten Cally hallucination sequences in Shadow.)
Maybe it's unfair to compare, since CB wrote more scripts, but I have noticed that oft-mentioned favourites by him include those episodes - especially Shadow, Star One and DeathWatch - in which *all* of the crew get a goodly share of the action;
Curious, I don't see Deathwatch as being very ensemble at all. Tarrant, the Jacket, and that annoying, misplaced clinch. I could cheerfully chuck Deathwatch from canon, were I not such a purist.
Anyone like to throw some thoughts on either scriptwriter? Or maybe muse on how one of the other writers *might* have gone in the role?
Allan Prior might have given us a wider variety of 'splinter' cultures - groups that had left the Federation to pursue their own vision of a perfect society. And not much A-V, though what there was is very good, including my favourite A-V scene in Volcano. He was much worse about leaving regular characters with not much to do than Holmes was, although it seems to be different characters each time.
Mistral
Mistral wrote:
Curious, I don't see Deathwatch as being very ensemble at all. Tarrant, the Jacket, and that annoying, misplaced clinch. I could cheerfully chuck Deathwatch from canon, were I not such a purist.
Ah, must spring to the defence of one of my favourites. The reason that I think it's a great ensemble piece is that it uses all the characters *in character* to drive the plot along.
Vila sets the whole thing off by wanting to go to the pub (and then actually, explicitly gets to be 'everyman' when he puts on the disc thing).
Tarrant's past provides the particular narrative for this episode, and he has to be the 'hero'.
Dayna's vendetta against Servie provides the plot mechanism whereby we get from the first half (Deeta vs Vinnie) to the second half (Del vs Vinnie); this is the best bit since in the other (almost) successful ensemble piece, 'Sarcophagus', Lee has to invent a personality 'quirk' for Dayna (the music) to fit her into the plot.
Cally's telepathy enables Tarrant to equal the playing field between him and the android.
Avon is masterminding the whole thing, and the clinch scene with Servie acts (subtextually) as a microcosm for the big picture of galactic politics, in the same way that the battle between the two champions acts (explicitly) as a microcosm for war between Teal and Vandor.
OK, so it's deeply formulaic in several respects (one of the cast playing his own relative, the fact that it's a western, the Bob Holmes style double-act who give us the plot exposition), but that's the point, isn't it, with formula television (which an ensemble drama series is, by definition)? But 'Deathwatch' is just so smooth, it's like Boucher's pen has been oiled.
Plus the sets are cool.
Una