In a message dated 3/9/01 12:48:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, ragan(a)sdc.org
writes:
<< Whereas I imagine somebody stuck firmly in Approach #1 is likely to find
that response utterly bizarre.
(Gawd, I hope at least some of that makes sense. It's *really*
difficult to put this stuff into words.) >>
I think you did great, Betty. I also think you've hit the nail squarely on
the head.
And adding in my own personal comment, the conflict(s) are coming in (imo)
when people who look at it via Approach #1 continue to insist that folks who
prefer Approach #2 comply with *their* methods. Although I don't mind being
asked to participate in Approach #1, if my response is "I'm not interested" I
don't expect to be belittled, told I'm copping out, told I don't have "proof"
and various and sundry other insulting things.
Annie