Pike-devel

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

3044 discussions

Re: Compiling only core pike
by Martin Nilsson (DivX Networks) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

I tested a xenofarm export from tonight and it failed with sources.h in Shuffler not being generated. Maybe my mingw make is broken... / Martin Nilsson (DivX Networks) Previous text: >12769793 2005-01-07 12:04 /36 lines/ Brevbäraren >Recipients: Pike (-) importmöte för mailinglistan >Comment to 12753958 >Subject: Re: Compiling only core pike >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Ashish Ranjan wrote: > >> Hi, >> i am 4 days old newbie to pike.I am in love with its c++ like syntax >> and clean design. But when i am trying to compile pike on mingw + msys >> on MS-Windows, i am unable to do so. I tried to compile it using >> --without-GTK after someone told me about it on irc, but even then it >> is giving error. >> Can anybody tell me how to compile CORE PIKE ( i mean to say, pike >> interpreter and only that portion of pike which is in ANSI C/C++) in >> mingw+msys. > >Pike 7.7 should now compile cleanly under mingw+msys. Previously it got >a bit confused since it couldn't determine if it was a POSIX or a win32 >system. > >> If someone has compiled pike using mingw+msys then kindly tell me >> how to do so. If none has done it , then kindly atleast tell me how to >> compile pike in a minimal way stripped of almost all th features (may >> be ANSI C/C++ code only be there) . > >To compile just type make at the top directory. > >To minimize, use --without-<modulename> to configure (eg via >CONFIGUREARGS). > >> Thanks in advance. >> bye :-) >> Ashish Ranjan >> ashishwave(a)yahoo.com > >-- >Henrik Grubbström grubba(a)roxen.com >Roxen Internet Software AB > > > >(12769793) /Brevbäraren/-------------------------------------------- >

2 8

MinGW
by Martin Nilsson (DivX Networks) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

If someone else would like to try to compile Pike on MinGW I've made an installer for the environment I use (MinGW, MSYS, autoconf, GMP, Nettle) http://pike.ida.liu.se/generated/MinGW.exe

2 2

does inherits has changed behavior with pike 7.6.24 ?
by Xavier Beaudouin 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

Hello there, I found that in some case (mostly inside caudium 1.4 tree) that inherits has stopped to work as it was before. Before : inherits "foo"; was looking on the directory of file that calls for foo and after in the module path directories Now : Looks only on module path directories only... Note that I have allmost same behavior with include "foo.pike"; So is there any internal things that have been changed recently on pike 7.6.24 ? Is there an incompatiblity between pike 7.6.xx (with xx < 24) and pike >= 7.6.24 ??? /Xavier -- Xavier Beaudouin - Unix System Administrator & Projects Leader. President of Kazar Organization : http://www.kazar.net/ Please visit http://caudium.net/, home of Caudium & Camas projects

2 1

Bump version of 7.6 and... make a new release ?
by Xavier Beaudouin 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

Hello there, Is there any plan about releasing a new version of Pike 7.6 ? Thanks, Xavier -- Xavier Beaudouin - Unix System Administrator & Projects Leader. President of Kazar Organization : http://www.kazar.net/ Please visit http://caudium.net/, home of Caudium & Camas projects

2 1

Compiling with VC7
by Peter Bortas ＠ Pike developers forum 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

I've been trying to put together a more modern win32 compilation environment this afternoon with resonably good success. Compiling the assembler parts of Nettle seems to be problematic though. Am I first to compile with MSVC.Net2003 (VC7) or has someone already solved this problem somewhere else? Ref: http://pike.ida.liu.se/generated/pikefarm/7.6/221_176/compilelog.txt

3 11

pike 7.6.24 for debian?
by Martin Bähr 06 Jan '05

06 Jan '05

hello, will there be debian packages for 7.6.24 eventually? and will they make it into the sarge release? (i fear not) greetings, martin.

1 0

RES: Bare-bones Pike
by Mirar ＠ Pike developers forum 28 Dec '04

28 Dec '04

I think it's solved already, yes.

1 0

RES: Bare-bones Pike
by Marcus Agehall (PacketFront) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 28 Dec '04

28 Dec '04

That may just be a very good (read "easy") way of getting around the problem. I would very much like to hear what Grubba and mast has to say about that solution. If they approve, I'll go ahead and write a small wrapper lib..

2 2

RES: Bare-bones Pike
by Mirar ＠ Pike developers forum 28 Dec '04

28 Dec '04

I haven't really looked into it, but shouldn't it be possible to use a library with few symbols that use the dynamic library loader to load the rest of the pike, and thus doesn't share the symbols? Just as Pike loads .so modules. [adding dev] / Mirar Previous text: >12737290 2004-12-28 08:48 /10 lines/ Marcus Agehall (PacketFront) >Recipients: Pike (-) importmöte för mailinglistan >Comment to 12735984 >Subject: RES: Bare-bones Pike >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >I've done some work on embedding pike. Currently, there isn't much >going on on that front. > >Basically, to embed pike, you must change the main routine a bit. I >have those changes somewhere and I should probably commit them to the >7.7 repository... > >Anyway, the biggest problem with embedding pike, is that you get a >*LOT* of symbols with the lib. This can cause you problems, but if you >manage to avoid name clashes, you should be fine. > >(12737290) /Marcus Agehall (PacketFront)/--------------------------- >

1 0

Re: [Chilimoon-dev] ChiliMoon source repository migration to SVN/SVK?
by Stephen R. van den Berg 25 Dec '04

25 Dec '04

Johan Sundstr?m (Achtung Liebe!) @ ChiliMoon (-) Mooh, mooh wrote: >> One final question here; would anybody object to actually picking my >> current SVN/SVK repository as master for the ChiliMoon sources? >I think that would be great. If and when the time comes for migrating Ok, I'm setting up things now then. If anybody objects, he'd better hurry :-). >UI, it might be worth testing some alternative; the demos I've seen of >Chora for instance (http://freshmeat.net/projects/chora/), isn't tenth >as bad as ViewCVS. Quite so. I'll leave this as an exercise to the reader for now. Especially since you can mirror the SVK repository and test it locally (without going over the Internet). >Besides, actually having a live svn repository might encourage people >to upgrade code librarian all the way to supporting subversion. (Not >sure if I'll have the time myself, but it's more likely than if there >is no present need for it.) Quite right. It never hurts to tickle some interest. >The same probably applies to the Pike site and repository, eventually. >Will there be a read-only subversion tree open for Pike, that we can >point to from the site (noting details such as how often it is synced >et cetera)? I'm making read-only versions of Pike and Roxen available; synced at least every night, possibly even every hour (I have to check what kind of load it creates). The nice thing about the Roxen SVN I'm making available is that it is completely linked with the ChiliMoon repository. ChiliMoon will be read-only for all, and read-write only for developers, of course. -- Sincerely, srb(a)cuci.nl Stephen R. van den Berg (AKA BuGless). Are they twins? Yes. Are they *both* yours? _______________________________________________ Chilimoon-dev mailing list Chilimoon-dev(a)list.chilimoon.org http://pipermail.gusi.at/mailman/listinfo/chilimoon-dev

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel