Pike-devel October 2005

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

9 participants
20 discussions

Pike 7.6
by Martin Nilsson (DivX Inc.) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 23 Aug '06

23 Aug '06

It is time for a new release of Pike 7.6. Is there anyone who can do the release notes? If not, we'll just wait a bit longer...

9 12

Pike 7.6.48
by Martin Nilsson (Opera) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 02 Nov '05

02 Nov '05

New Release Candidate at http://pike.ida.liu.se/pub/pike/beta/7.6.48/Pike-v7.6.48.tar.gz

5 14

Re: 7.6.40
by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

If you touch language.yacc, make ought to rebuild language.h.

3 4

7.6.44
by Bill Welliver 26 Oct '05

26 Oct '05

target: solaris 9/sparc make CONFIGUREARGS="-with-force-ua32" make verify was successful. Bill

1 0

7.6.40
by Martin Nilsson (lvl 60) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 25 Oct '05

25 Oct '05

I have made a new 7.6 beta, available at http://pike.ida.liu.se/pub/pike/beta/7.6.40-20051024/Pike-v7.6.40.tar.gz Please test it and see if you find any blocking bugs. Otherwise this will be released as the next stable 7.6.

6 13

NIL revisited
by H. William Welliver III 22 Oct '05

22 Oct '05

A number of us were having a conversation earlier about UNDEFINED and zero and zero_type() and the whole problem of knowing if you are passing a value, or passing undefined or passing a value that's been specifically unset. We found conversation on this whole topic in January 2003, and just as it seemed to be getting somewhere, things veered off course. I'd like to rekindle the conversation, if possible... I believe the proposal was that a new constant NIL be added which is the integer zero with a subtype set. My sense is that there'd need to be a new subtype for this, as you wouldn't really want to use the same subtype as used for an indexing operation on a non-existent index. Additionally, you'd need some way to check for a NIL value. The two options are something like nilp(someval), or modifying the comparison functions to check the subtype value. Any thoughts on this? If we didn't change the fact that variables are initialized to zero, would there be any incompatibilities with this notion? Bill

1 0

ETA for new pike 7.6 release ?
by Xavier Beaudouin 21 Oct '05

21 Oct '05

Hello, Any news or things to be done before pike 7.6 release ? Thanks, /Xavier

8 21

Re: ETA for new pike 7.6 release ?
by H. William Welliver III 20 Oct '05

20 Oct '05

On OSX 10.4.2: make ran fine; make doc had a few unresolved references; make snapshot died on checking ansi prototype capability. Solaris 9/ sun4u: make CONFIGUREARGS="--with-force-ua32" died: Making GTK /export/home/hww3/Pike-v7.6-snapshot/build/sunos-5.9-sun4u/pike - DNOT_INSTALLED -DPRECOMPILED_SEARCH_MORE -m/export/home/hww3/Pike- v7.6-snapshot/build/sunos-5.9-sun4u/master.pike /export/home/hww3/ Pike-v7.6-snapshot/src/post_modules/GTK/new_build_pgtk.pike -- source='/export/home/hww3/Pike-v7.6-snapshot/src/post_modules/GTK/ source/'\ /export/home/hww3/Pike-v7.6-snapshot/src/ post_modules/GTK/output/few.pike *** Error code 138 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `compile1' I ran from the GTK directory: ../../pike -DNOT_INSTALLED -DPRECOMPILED_SEARCH_MORE -m/export/home/ hww3/Pike-v7.6-snapshot/build/sunos-5.9-sun4u/master.pike Bus Error (core dumped) gdb ../../pike core bt #0 0xff198c04 in readdir64_r () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #1 0x16d03c in f_get_dir (args=1) at /export/home/hww3/Pike-v7.6-snapshot/src/modules/files/ efuns.c:969 #2 0x3b380 in opcode_F_CALL_BUILTIN1 (arg1=30) at /export/spare/pike/data/pikefarm/out_work/7.6/Pike/7.6/src/ interpret_functions.h:2209 #3 0xfeeb087c in ?? () #4 0x32f74 in eval_instruction (pc=0xfef00e48) at /export/home/hww3/Pike-v7.6-snapshot/src/interpret.c:1287 #5 0x3e1c4 in mega_apply (type=APPLY_LOW, args=1, arg1=0x31fa04, arg2=0x1) at /export/home/hww3/Pike-v7.6-snapshot/src/interpret.c:2006 #6 0x3ef68 in apply_lfun (o=0x313810, fun=1, args=1) at /export/home/hww3/Pike-v7.6-snapshot/src/interpret.c:2372 #7 0xc2f74 in object_index_no_free (to=0xfef80200, o=0x313810, index=0xfef801c0) at /export/home/hww3/Pike-v7.6-snapshot/src/ object.c:1279 #8 0xc5b70 in index_no_free (to=0xfef80200, what=0xfef801d0, ind=0xfef801c0) at /export/home/hww3/Pike-v7.6-snapshot/src/operators.c:62 #9 0x395a0 in opcode_F_LOCAL_LOCAL_INDEX (arg1=0, arg2=2) at /export/spare/pike/data/pikefarm/out_work/7.6/Pike/7.6/src/ interpret_functions.h:1656 #10 0xff050cbc in ?? () #11 0x32f74 in eval_instruction (pc=0xff050e64) at /export/home/hww3/Pike-v7.6-snapshot/src/interpret.c:1287 On Oct 18, 2005, at 5:50 AM, Martin Nilsson (lvl 60) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote: > Well, we have silently been working on a 7.6 release for the last few > weeks, with e.g some fixes for the latest bundle versions yesterday. > I've had reports on problems with generating the configure files > from the > CVS version, which is the only issue that currently blocks a release > AFAIK. It would be nice if everyone took a fresh CVS-check out and > made > > make > make doc > make snapshot > > and reported any problems (and solutions :) here. > >

1 0

init error
by Martin Nilsson (lvl 60) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 19 Oct '05

19 Oct '05

Is it supposed to be possible to use Pike_error in PIKE_MODULE_INIT? When I do it I get a segfault upon exit when the failing module is freed.

3 7

test_pike
by Bill Welliver 17 Oct '05

17 Oct '05

I was wondering if it might be useful to make test_pike runnable via pike -x... it seems like it might be useful for non-module purposes, too. Any thoughts? Bill

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel October 2005