Pike-devel

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

3041 discussions

Experiences with 7.7
by Bill Welliver 09 Nov '06

09 Nov '06

I'm finally getting around to trying 7.7 with some of my modules, and I've got a few observations: 1. On my install at least, pike/include/pike/precompile.pike was installed without execute permissions. 2. I've tried to compile a few modules that have C language components, and there seems to be a problem with the makefile stubs: Linking Tree /usr/local/pike/7.7.30/include/pike/smartlink: line 188: -o: command not found Linking failed: /usr/local/pike/7.7.30/include/pike/smartlink -o module.so tree.o support.o rbtree.o splay.o /usr/lib/gcc/i686-apple-darwin8/4.0.1/libgcc.a -lc /usr/lib/gcc/i686-apple-darwin8/4.0.1/libgcc.a make[1]: *** [module.so] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 Any thoughts?

1 0

Subversion repository
by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 05 Nov '06

05 Nov '06

And if you don't have svn 1.4, you can use svn log -rhead:26702 program.c | tail as a kind of workaround. (Since the log starts at head, the path will match the desired object in this case.)

1 0

Subversion repository
by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 05 Nov '06

05 Nov '06

I now have a rather complete conversion of the Pike repository to Subversion (some more copyfrom links could be added, but otherwise everything should be ok). It includes all checkins up to and including 2006-08-29, which when I'm writing this means "everything". The dump file is in pelix:/pike/home/marcus/pike_svn.dump.gz. My suggestion is that we create an accessible repository from this somewhere, to be able to work on tooling, and to check for glitches in the conversion. Once that is ready, I'll make a new conversion for the actual switch. Which means that everything checked into the temporary repository would be discarded. I have not converted projects/ or Pike/ulpc or Pike/extra_tests, as these are not branches of the main Pike development tree. Any opinions on whether to convert some or all of these, and in that case should they be in the same repository or a different one? Some statistics: Conversion: ----------- Number of revisions: 31738 Conversion script run rime: 15h 15mins (on pelix) Dump size (uncompressed): 1.7Gb Dump size (compressed): 384Mb Test import: ------------ Dump import time: 4h 24mins (on bhelliom) Reposiory size: 421Mb (with fsfs)

7 13

pre 7.2 lib/modules/SSL.pmod ,v files
by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 03 Nov '06

03 Nov '06

In trying to convert the Pike CVS repositories to Subversion, I've come across something really odd. Looking at the ,v files in /pike/data/cvsroot/Pike/7.2/lib/modules/SSL.pmod, it seems that this module was created on 1997-03-13, and included in such tags as "pike_v0_5_release_47". Yet, there is no trace of this module under /pike/data/cvsroot/Pike/0.5 (or 0.6, or 7.0), under this name or any other as far as I can tell. Where are the missing ,v files? Did somebody miss some CVSROOT/modules magic when copying the repositories from RIS?

7 15

Re: c modules and function names
by Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS ＠ Pike developers forum 16 Oct '06

16 Oct '06

I see, it's that kind of generic glue code. An alternative is to look at the Java module which solves the same (or at least a very similar) problem.

3 3

Re: c modules and function names
by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 15 Oct '06

15 Oct '06

The downside of this is that A) inherit on a Java class doesn't work as expected B) you can't declare something as being of a particular Java class

1 0

c modules and function names
by H. William Welliver III 13 Oct '06

13 Oct '06

what is the best way to determine the name of the function being run when in a c module? I'm using name = ID_FROM_INT(Pike_fp->current_object->prog, Pike_fp- >fun)->name; when calling non-constant functions, but that doesn't seem to work when the function being called was added using add_function_constant(). any suggestions? Bill

5 12

File references
by Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

We have problem with the internal circular references within the Stdio.File objects. The problem is that not only are the objects as garbage until gc, but the associated file descriptors as well. This becomes a problem with massive amounts of connections. Our short term solution is to sprinkle the code with destruct(file->fd), but I would like to ask what can be done within Pike, both short term (if anything) and as long term solution.

7 11

Pike Conference 2006 Reminder
by H. William Welliver III 08 Oct '06

08 Oct '06

This year's Pike Conference is rapidly approaching, but there's still time to attend or participate! A lot of exciting things have been happening in the Pike world since our last meeting two years ago. We've got some very interesting presentations, discussions and activities on tap, so if you're still deciding whether to attend, consider this a nudge in the direction of Riga. :) A free, in-depth Pike tutorial session will also run concurrently with the conference, so if you're new to Pike, or you'd like to brush up on your Pike coding skills, this is a perfect opportunity. For those of you that may have missed the original announcement, this year's Pike Conference will be held in beautiful Riga, Latvia, from October 18 through the 22nd. Riga's old town was named a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and getting to and from Riga has never been easier. For more information, send an email to the conference coordinators at conference at gotpike dot org, or visit the conference website at: http://conference.gotpike.org If you know you'll attending, but haven't registered yet, please take a moment to do so now, as it allows the conference team to better plan activities to suit your interests and schedule. Also, we still have spaces for participants; so if you'd like to make a presentation, suggest a topic for group discussion or just want to say a few words in person, do let us know, as we'd love to include you in the program. Hope to see you in Riga! Bill Welliver for the Pike Conference Committee conference at gotpike dot org

1 0

method signatures in C modules
by H. William Welliver III 06 Oct '06

06 Oct '06

I've got a question regarding method signatures in C modules. I've noted that add_function_constant() and quick_add_function both take arguments that specify the method signature. However, the form of the specification is different for each. I'm wondering a) whether there's a significant difference in the way they work and b) what these signatures are used for in c language modules if the function code normally does the argument checking. I'm just wondering how much effort I need to put into signatures for methods in my auto-generated objective-c wrapper classes. Hopefully someone can enlighten me. :) Bill

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel