I've been following the changes file and just thought I would mention that
the subject example includes GNU-makeisms that aren't compatible with
standard make.
Also, is it appropriate to recommend that users not use the standard
module build method? The sample, while simple, seems to require the
inclusion of a lot of rules that already exist in
dynamic_module_makefile, however without a lot of the edge case handling.
I'm all for simplification, but I'm concerned that recommending users
write modules in this manner will result in a lot of modules floating
around that don't build or install properly.
Bill