In a message dated 3/6/01 7:47:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, wilsonfisk2@yahoo.com writes:
<< > We are not looking to prove that they are
homosexual or bisexual just that that possibility is not excluded.
It is not specifically excluded, but that is becase the thought of this interpretation never crossed anyone's mind. >>
And you know this... how? Unless you can claim to be the director, the editor, the actors, and the writers all rolled up into one, you have nothing to base this statement upon. Certainly nothing to make a "case" with.
Annie
--- Ashton7@aol.com wrote:
<< > We are not looking to prove that they are
homosexual or bisexual just that that possibility is not excluded.
I wrote:
It is not specifically excluded, but that is becase the thought of this interpretation never crossed anyone's mind. >>
Annie wrote:
And you know this... how? Unless you can claim to be the director, the editor, the actors, and the writers all rolled up into one, you have nothing to base this statement upon. Certainly nothing to make a "case" with.
Hang on. In the space of a few days you've gone from arguing that the intentions of the authors/actors are irrelevant (dead author theory) or at the very least concurring with the views of those who do, to demanding I provide evidence that the cast/crew didn't intend it?
Very well. Paul Darrow's attitude to slash is well known, and has caused the poor man no end of trouble with those who just won't let it go. Chris Boucher has rubbished the idea publically and Gareth Thomas doesn't think that Blake and Avon were lovers. They have all said that they never intended such an interpretaion to be taken from thier text.
OK?
wf wilsonfisk2@yahoo.com
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
Ashton7＠aol.com -
Wilson Fisk