Just a mention on who I reply to... I don't usually know who I'm replying to when I first hit reply (only a small segment of the message is showing, what prompts be to answer, and it usually does not include the name of the writer.) I scroll up or down after to see who it is if I very much want to quote by name or if I want to reply off list, in which case I have to copy and paste their name and delete the list. Therefore, I hope NO ONE is offended if I answer some more often than others. I do usually know Neil's posts while reading as he has a tendancy to choose different subjects and approach them different ways. With Mistral, Ellynne and Kathryn's posts, I can tell it's one of them and frequently which one. All others I must check names on, and even with the people I know, I reply based on whether the topic stirs me to contribute.
On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 04:43:14PM -0700, Helen Krummenacker wrote:
With Mistral, Ellynne and Kathryn's posts, I can tell it's one of them and frequently which one.
Wow! We're recognisable! We're a cluster! I must admit, there's been more than one occassion when Mistral or Ellynne has said what I wanted to say, only they said it first... and I know that's been true the other way around for at least one of them... but I deny categorically that we all share a brain -- we're much too intelligent to do cranial time-share... (grin)
Kathryn Andersen (two days to go, and I shall be freezing instead of melting...) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Life isn't all fricassied frog and eel pie. -Puddleglum the Marshwiggle
Kathryn Andersen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 04:43:14PM -0700, Helen Krummenacker wrote:
With Mistral, Ellynne and Kathryn's posts, I can tell it's one of them and frequently which one.
Wow! We're recognisable! We're a cluster!
LOL! I found it amusing that Helen said 'frequently', considering Ellynne and I always seem to be on the opposite side of the argument, and you, Kat, are so much more concise than either of us.
Mistral "Hugs? We don't need no stinking hugs!" Moonbeam