the fact that it is there in the zine and unchallenged _would_ suggest to
readers that Actor X had approved or consented to their presence there.
You're joking, right? I mean, you HAVE to be kidding. The teeny tiny minority of fans who might even conceivably believe this really must be too stupid to live. And doubtless we'd be doing them a favor by eliminating them from the gene pool.
Look, if Sally Knyvette gets a bit upset about a few pictures of her taken on a bad hair day, what's she going to do if she finds someone selling a picture of her doing the nasty with Gareth Thomas?
Stop appearing at cons. shrug. My enjoyment of B7 and zines would remain undiminished in any case. My enjoyment of B7 has nothing at all to do with conventions (and if it did would have nothing at all to do with guest actors). Anyone who doesn't wish to be exposed to nastiness from journalists, fans and critics shouldn't be an actor. I'm not saying one needs to deliberately provoke actors, but if adult zines containing artwork are kept out of general view then that is enough. I am not really interested in adult artwork, particularly of B7 actors who Lord knows are not my idea of fabulous naked, but fans shouldn't be banned from creating it.
----------------------------------------------------- This message was sent via the CCMnet Mailman. Visit our website: http://www.ccm.net