21 Feb
2001
21 Feb
'01
9:17 p.m.
Fiona wrote:
Neil has made several rational, intelligent posts lately on the subject of why he considers H/C to resemble S/M. Very few people have actually posted in to say "OK, Neil, I see your point," or "OK, Neil, but you're overlooking..." Either they haven't responded, or they've responded with categorical denials of the thesis of the debate which, as my old philosophy tutor used to say, is a non-starter.
I would have responded to these at length, however at present it appears to be tricky to discuss S&M and h/c without getting people's knickers in a twist. And we wouldn't want to do that.
Tavia http://www.viragene.com/