----- Original Message ----- From: Iain Coleman ijc@bas.ac.uk To: Lysator blakes7@lists.lysator.liu.se Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 4:05 PM Subject: Re: Re [B7L] Deliverance - keg marxist take (OT)
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Fiona Moore wrote:
There appears to be some
kind of correlation between what Karl Popper described as The Open Society and the scientific method.
Broadly speaking, in closed societies knowledge is handed down by tradition which may not be criticised. In open societies, free discussion and rational thought is both accepted and encouraged.
Unfortunately, though, Popper was a sociologist and as such had very
little
contact with "primitive" societies. Most anthropological accounts
suggest
that in societies in which knowledge is handed down by tradition there
is
far more discussion and reinterpretation than Popper and his lot think--
It was my impression that, when Popper was writing about closed societies, he had something considerably more contemporary in mind.
Erm, excuse me? I *was* talking about contemporary societies, or at least societies contemporary with Popper. Just because something's "primitive," doesn't mean it's historical.
Fiona (who frequently gets fed up with people who conflate anthropology with archaeology)
The Posthumous Memoirs of Secretary Rontane Available for public perusal at http://nyder.r67.net
_________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com