8 Feb
2001
8 Feb
'01
5:50 a.m.
Neil Faulkner wrote:
Actually 'the post that started it all' accused the episode, not Avon, of misogyny. A classic case of imposing a CJ framework on a non-CJ thread, methinks.
True about accusing the episode; however what several were saying (including myself and I think Sally as well to an extent) is that the manner in which the subject was treated _as demonstrated by the Avon-Meegat interaction_ undercut or reversed the effect of what might have been misogyny with a different treatment. I don't think this is a case of the thread being hijacked, but a clear case of both approaches being relevant to the issue under discussion.
Mistral
--
"Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo. So little time! So much to know!"
--Jeremy Hilary Boob, Ph.D.