--- Bizarro7@aol.com wrote:
and *I'm* somehow guilty of semantic manoeuvring, ego and self-congratulation.
There was a cerain element of semantic trickery and equivocation contained within your posts in this thread.
Since you and your cohort never once stated what you actually meant, that would be a tad unrealistic, don't you think?
I think it was fairly clear form the initial point. The single word 'sex' is used frequently as a standard euphamism for what you have term "the performance of the act of sex"
And as for "cohort" altho' Mr. Faulkner has shown, in the course of these debates, that he is an intelligent, open-minded person with a skill for making a valid argument, I have never met nor spoken to him. More's the pity.
Well, I'll certainly take credit for some clarity,
I wouldn't.
wf wilsonfisk2@yahoo.com
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/