From: Bizarro7@aol.com
Dear me, what an alarming case of projection. Someone else omits a
critical
word in their debate, and *I'm* somehow guilty of semantic manoeuvring,
ego
and self-congratulation.
I'm disappointed, Rosenthal. Until now I've considered you a worthy bit of oppo, but resorting to the next step up from the 'takes one to know one' line is really scraping the barrel.
Since you and your cohort
My and my *what*? I dare to agree with one person who has the temerity to disagree with you, and suddenly I'm marching at the head of a legion. It'll be conspiracy theories next.
never once stated what you actually meant, that would be a tad unrealistic, don't you think? I'm flattered, however, that
you
believe I have powers of extrasensory perception. Why, I must have automatically *known* that the repeated word of the generalized word 'sex'
in
the phrase "pornography and sex are not the same thing" actually meant "pornography and the performance of the act of sex are not the same
thing."
Only a complete idiot would have been unable to draw the distinction. Since you are not an idiot, let alone a complete one, you could only have been playing games to defend your own untenable corner.
Neil