Ellynne G. said:
- If Avon had been captured and tried, he should have been interrogated
about the scam. Since Anna had been interrogated and (apparently) killed, his survival raises lots of questions (maybe he blackmailed the judge?).
There are differential survival rates in surgery, and that's supposed to HELP people.
- Granted, Anna's not about to win honesty awards, but, for her
statements to have made any sense at all (before and after being shot), it stands to reason Avon didn't stand trial - a publicized trial would have let her know he was alive and 'letting him go' implies he didn't stand trial.
It could imply that he lived long enough to stand trial, somewhat contrary to expectations
More interesting is Grant's blunt statement that Avon should have shot the man - and the implied assumption that it's what he would have expected Avon to do.
I don't know--usually a statement like "you should have" is meant as a reproach for not doing it.
Still working on the Unified B7 Theorem.
Me too, but the task is made more difficult by the BBC team not feeling the need to construct any such thing.
-(Y)