Blakes7

blakes7@lists.lysator.liu.se

5511 discussions

Slash - Well Done FM & BR.
by seven＠gaudaprime.com 10 Mar '01

10 Mar '01

After the truce Fiona wrote Having hashed out the relative status of B/A slash with regard to canon, onscreen evidence, dramatic convention, visual grammar and entertainment value, shall we go for dinner? <offers arm -- in a totally nonsexual way, of course :)> Betty responded [LOL] You like Chinese? :) David I just wanted to say: "Well said and well done" to you both. DC

1 0

Re: [B7L] Modes of engagement/slash
by Harriet Monkhouse 10 Mar '01

10 Mar '01

Tavia wrote: >Personally, I have a great deal more emotional > investment in 'my' Avon's musical taste than >his taste in sexual partners. I can believe him with > (in alphabetical order) Blake, Cally, Jenna, Tarrant, > Servalan, Vila, or for that matter, xyz sexworker at >abc space-port, or being 100% faithful to Anna; >but in all cases he likes Bach. Avon doesn't like music at all. At least, Julius Caesar thought he didn't. Re use of "my": >Everyone I've ever … [View More]

1 0

Japan..
by Nathan Hook 10 Mar '01

10 Mar '01

Fiona described Japan as a poor example of low crime and liberal attitudes to porn and violence in the cartoons there. Having had a few friends over in Japan including my old boss on a rather long business trip I would have to agree about it being a poor example. My old boss found circumstances rather unusual over there and was quite critical of Japanese society. Despite it's low crime tag, he said crime was quite rife over there. It's just not reported and often is white collar crime or … [View More]japanese mafia type stuff. Women appear to be less respected than their male counterparts. My boss was offered a woman for the night as a "gift" of the company he visited, whether she was an employee or a prostitute on the books was hard to say.(that would still make her an employee I spose.) Nevertheless it was a bit of a shock compared to the usual pleasantries exchanged in a business deal. By the same token, pack rape is quite common and I understand women over there often have great difficulty getting sex attacks investigated by the police. In a documnetary I saw on Japanese society similar things with regards to women being sexually assaulted frequently, on packed tokyo commuter trains. You often hear about the order of the japanese, but my boss found it amusing to see nuclear powerplants or other industrial plants in the middle of residential areas. there was no organised town planning. I was tempted to go and teach english there...but the UK may be the go yet. No offence to Japanese people in general of course. So, the point is, often the tags are not deserved. My pad, NZ is portrayed as low crime and a clean and green place. Yet, we have some of the worlds greatest methane ouputs, due to all the farm animals and the lush green grass. except at the moment, there's a drought in the country, it's beginning to look like australia. Crime is certainly here, and tourists often get attacked unfortunately by psychopathic predators who seem to be prevalent here. I'm in firm belief that a lot of trouble has been added to the mix as a result of deinstitutionalisation. Like the UK and the USA before them, somebody thought it would be a good idea to release psychiatric patients into the community, 'cause it wasn't nice to keep them locked up. So now, if the patients aren't being preyed on themselves by oportunists who take advantage of the vulnerable ones, the seriously unstable ones are a danger to the public. Only recently a guy who chopped off his girlfriends head and stuck it in the clothes dryer in a plastic bag was given a weekend pass to see his mother. How nice. Only he went and lay on the tracks at the local railway station, unfortunately/fortunately he didn't get killed. Naturally the police were impressed because it was only 18mnths since his arrest and a psychiatrist said he was showing no signs of anti-social behaviour and was perfectly okay to be out...or words to that effect. I wonder what methods the federation would have used to "treat" psychiatric illness? to bring it back to a B7 applicable lyst topic. Nathan. A 'strange coincidence', to use a phrase/ By which such things are settled nowadays. Byron. ------------------------------------------------------------ Free, BeOS-friendly email accounts: http://BeMail.org/ Peep! .:. http://twinfusion.com/comic/peep/ .:. An Epic Webcomic [View Less]

4 3

Re: [B7L] impressionable kiddies and mixed zines
by Tavia 10 Mar '01

10 Mar '01

Neil: >But a minority does not become irrelevant simply for being tiny. There are >children in fandom, and that must be taken into account. ... >Since there are children in fandom, we ought to assume that some of them >might well read fan fiction. If we assume that, we have to acknowledge that >there are zines out there that maybe they shouldn't read. I knew someone would say this. In the case of children intro'd to the show by parentfen (hard to think how else they'd come … [View More]

3 2

Re: Blake/Jenna
by Betty Ragan 10 Mar '01

10 Mar '01

Responding to me, Fiona wrote: > > Er, I don't regard that as accepted. I mean, I think it's a perfectly > > reasonable interpretation, but I don't think it's clear enough that I'd > > regard it as canonical. (Given, of course, my "canon is only what's on > > the screen" POV.) > > But (not to crack the wind of the poor phrase, running it thus), it *is* > onscreen. The *look* is onscreen. The cruisy or non-cruisy nature of it is in the eye of the beholder. … [View More]

1 0

Does Avon love Anna?
by Caveatemptor1＠aol.com 10 Mar '01

10 Mar '01

<, Mistral wrote: << Mind you, in light of recent discussions I should probably point out that I only participate in the above sort of exercise because I personally find it entertaining, and you're perfectly entitled to think what you like. >> DITTO... << Mistral wrote: << For example, Dayna's comment, "You killed someone he loved." That she _said_ it is canon; that we take it as evidence that Avon loved Anna requires that we _assume_ (i.e. interpret) that (1) … [View More]she was being honest, and (2) that she knew what she was talking about. >> I believe Avon loved Anna simply because the whole episode is an example of "easy" writing. Therefore, I take everything in it at face value. I believe it because Dayna said it. I agree with the person who said it's the writer's way of letting the audience know what's going on. (I apologize for not remembering who said this.) There's also the fact that I simply prefer to believe that Avon did actually love Anna. :) The reason I can accept Dayna's word on it is that at some time (before the first scene of RoD) Avon must have presented his intensions to the crew. We don't know what he said to them (it's doubtful he actually said, "I loved her and must avenge her."). But whatever he said it was enough to convince them to go along with him. And something in the way he presented it told Dayna he was in love with this woman. The question I find difficult to answer is...did Anna love Avon? << Cheryl wrote: << The fact that a man who values his life so much that he would willingly sacrifice a longtime crewmate in order to save his own, yet who acknowledges that he would have willingly given up his life for Anna, confirms, that he places the life of Anna above his own. >> I agree that Avon's statement to Grant confirms his love for Anna. This was the first time we learned any details about Avon's attempted embezzlement and I remember being fascinated that there was a love interest involved. I also recall latching onto the the loss of Anna as one possible explanation for Avon's aloofness. << Cheryl wrote; << To this I would respond, that it was never stated that Avon would 'willingly' give up his life for Blake. >> Hmmm. If Blake were captured by Federation torturers and Avon learned he could save Blake by presenting himself for death by torture, would he do it? I don't think so. I think Avon would try very hard to rescue Blake, but I don't believe he would surrender himself to certain death. <, Cheryl wrote: << Avon was not aware of a trap (on Terminal) only aware of the possibility >> I've always believed Avon was almost certain it was a trap. << and he obviously considered Blake important enough(for whatever reasons)to go there in the hopes of finding him. >> It's my personal belief that by this time Avon had discovered that the old saying, 'be careful what you wish for -- you may get," was all too true. << Cheryl wrote; << Speaking from the 'Avon loves Anna' camp, I would like to strengthen my previous points with an observation re: Avon and his on screen reaction to the deaths of both Anna and Blake. >> The one similarity that most struck me is that in both cases Avon emotionally shutdown. Courtney [View Less]

2 1

Plea to Leah and Shane
by Caveatemptor1＠aol.com 10 Mar '01

10 Mar '01

<< Shane wrote: << Why single us out? Why not Kingpin and Leah, or Neil and Leah... funny how that name keeps cropping up, isn't it? >> Probably because Leah is trying to defend a position that doesn't need defending. Slash discussions on lysator have NEVER been productive. Haven't we learned that yet? Leah, why are you wasting your time. Shane, Kingpin, et al are deliberately being obtuse. It isn't worth the effort. Lately the lyst is being driven by a few … [View More]

1 0

Re: Modes of engagement/slash
by Betty Ragan 10 Mar '01

10 Mar '01

Fiona wrote: > Me too. But what you also get is: > [likewise, hypothetical example only]: > > Person A: I think Blake is gay. > Person B: Why do you think that? > Person A: [cites a whole list of scenes]. > Person B: Oh but... [goes through the same list of scenes, pointing out > the dubiousness of each as evidence] > Person A: Oh, but I'm not trying to make *you* believe it! > > Which as I said is a hypothetical example-- but that's why I sometimes > mutter … [View More]about moving goalposts. Yeah, this is exactly the sort of thing I was thinking of when I said (in one of my later posts) that it can look to an "approach #1" type that an "approach #2" type is engaging in an analytical "approach #1"-type discussion and then trying to back out of it. When what person A might *think* she's doing is simply explaining where she got her own interpretion from. Like I said, cross purposes. (This may vary for specific values of Person A and Person B, of course. :)) > <snipping for length reasons. Hope you don't mind. If you do, I'll requote > it back in the next post in full... :)> No prob. > OK, calming down a bit now myself, too, and I think you're right-- some of > the people on this thread *have* been arguing at cross purposes. So what it > all boils down to is: there's canon and there's exercises in imagination > which refer to the canon without particularly feeling required to stick to > it? Well, that and there are different notions of what "sticking to canon" means. For many, that just means not contradicting canon in a blatant and un-work-around-able way. > To make sure I've understood, I'll refer back to the The Web example. So > person B would say "yep, Blake and Avon at loggerheads again," and > person A would say "but if you imagine they were lovers, then > *hmmm*..." More or less, I think. Person A might even put it more strongly, something like "Well, in my version of B7, they are lovers, so given that what's really going on here must be..." Etc., etc. That "in my version" is crucial, though, because it recognizes that that's not a take on things that is inevitably, logically, deducable from canon, but rather one that's a product of the unique interaction between viewer and canon. > If I've got it right (and I hope I have), then like I said to Steve, fair > enough :). Yeah, I think there's really a lot less actual *disagreement* here than would first appear, and that the conflict really boils down to a simple difference in approach. But then, I think that's true for 99% of intellectual conflicts, really... > (do you know, I can now quote whole swatches of 'Hostage' ? And it's YOUR > fault :)...). :) > But as I said before, that's a side issue > from trying to map one of those hypothetical points back onto the canon... > which I think we've argued into the ground :). Yeah. :) -- Betty Ragan ** bragan(a)nrao.edu ** http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/~bragan Not speaking for my employers, officially or otherwise. "Seeing a rotten picture for the special effects is like eating a tough steak for the smothered onions..." -- Isaac Asimov [View Less]

1 0

Freedom City
by Tiger M 10 Mar '01

10 Mar '01

Anyone who is over 18 and legally an adult in the area where they live is welcome to join Freedom City (and yes, I do ask for age statements to protect myself legally). I want to stress, however, that it *is* a slash-friendly and erotica-friendly list. Not everyone there is a slash fan, but members are expected to be tolerant. FC's predecessor, Space City, was created as a place where those who like slash can discuss it in peace without distressing those who do not. In accordance with that, … [View More]

1 0

Re: [B7L] Modes of engagement/slash
by Ellynne G. 10 Mar '01

10 Mar '01

On Fri, 9 Mar 2001 17:18:06 -0000 Tavia <tavia(a)btinternet.com> writes: > Personally, I have a great deal more emotional investment in 'my' > Avon's > musical taste than his taste in sexual partners. I can believe him > with (in > alphabetical order) Blake, Cally, Jenna, Tarrant, Servalan, Vila, or > for > that matter, xyz sexworker at abc space-port, or being 100% faithful > to > Anna; but in all cases he likes Bach. At first, I couldn't quite see … [View More]

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

Blakes7