28 Nov
2002
28 Nov
'02
5:05 p.m.
No, it's not committed. I suggested that you add that so that one can have a basetype function that doesn't call _sprintf. Calling sprintf("%t",x) doesn't solve that, since it calls _sprintf.
/ Martin Nilsson (hehe Torgny)
Previous text:
2002-11-28 22:57: Subject: CHANGES line of the day
Doesn't seem to be committed (in builtin.cmod). But I agree with Per that it's better to just use sprintf("%t"...) if that is what you want.
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS