That was a load of unsubstantiated crap. I haven't said that the error messages should be just for me. One of the interpretations here is consistent while the other means two contradicting, erroneous and/or nonapplicable sentences. If both interpretations has occurred at all it's obvious which one is intended; Pike experience is not a factor.
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
Previous text:
2003-02-11 00:50: Subject: Re: Implicit vs. explicit type casting with Pike
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:35:07AM +0100, Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum scribbled:
The second interpretation is unlikely since it doesn't make sense in
It was likely enough as to occur to several people already.
the given context. Before this it hasn't even occurred to me that it can be read that way. But go ahead and rephrase the message if you like.
You, nor any of the experienced Pike coders/developers, are not important in this case. You are biased in the sense that you know the code in and out. Don't expect that from anyone else who is trying to learn Pike. Try to look at it from the other side of the fence. I proposed two other wordings for the error in the two other messages - just let me know which suits you best and I'll add it to the CVS (and that would be a top of an iceberg only, I'm afraid...)
marek
/ Brevbäraren