That makes sense. Maybe there should be some provision to be able to
remove defines (as well as adding new ones).
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
Previous text:
>2003-12-19 03:43:
>Subject: Re: fork()ing into background (was Pike 7.6)
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>How about arguments like module paths and defines? Should these be part
>of the "environment" passed on to the newly started Pike?
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>Bill
>
>On Wednesday, December 17, 2003, at 07:15 PM, Martin Stjernholm, Roxen
>IS @ Pike developers forum wrote:
>
>>> Would it be necessary to put this in master(), as that's where the
>>> easiest access to agv/c would be?
>>
>> Some support in the master is necessary, but the function itself
>> probably belongs in the Process module. There are already two
>> variables _pike_file_name and _master_file_name in the master for
>> this.
>>
>> / Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
>
>
>
> / Brevbäraren
>