Pike-devel

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

3044 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Regexp("\\?+$")->match("?" * 99998 + "!"); // infinite loop (7.5/CVS)
by Alexander Demenshin 17 Mar '04

17 Mar '04

So the subject... gdb shows the place but it is nearly useless for me - I am not familiar with that RE engine... /Al

3 2

%i
by Martin Nilsson (saturator) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 16 Mar '04

16 Mar '04

What's the purpose of sscanf %i? It looks very much like %D, but not completely. Shouldn't they be identical?

2 2

Flags and libs for pthread support nightmarre on FreeBSD ports
by Xavier Beaudouin 16 Mar '04

16 Mar '04

Hello there, I am experencing a nightmarre with FreeBSD ports. They want that pthreads flags and libs to be specified namely to the program it is compiling. I have some patches and tryed some works on CVS but it cannot use the specified flags and libs. So I have 2 choices : - I find a way to specify that (and that's why I am asking that on pike-devel ml) - I give up and I let pike maintainance on freebsd to someone want it... (personaly I still want to use and work with pike so...) So I am asking for help from people that understand well how pike detect and use pthreads to help me to add a couple of flags to automake like : --with-named-thread-lib= --with-named-threds-flags= Notice that current one I have add into 7.5 doesn't honor the libs I specify... /Xavier PS: If it is working, I really like to backport that on 7.4 as well -- Xavier Beaudouin - Unix System Administrator & Projects Leader. President of Kazar Organization : http://www.kazar.net/ Please visit http://caudium.net/, home of Caudium & Camas projects

3 6

make verify hung (randomized pids problem?)
by Alexander Demenshin 15 Mar '04

15 Mar '04

Hi, I installed some kernel patch (grsecurity) which, among other things, has a feature to randomize pids (so never ever child will get a pid which is ppid + 1). Perhaps, this is the reason that during following test (test 10102, line 9153 from 7.4.44 - 7.5 cvs test is on the way): object proc = Process.create_process (({"/bin/sleep", "99999"})); array threads = allocate (10, Thread.thread_create) ( lambda (object proc) {proc->wait();}, proc); sleep (1); proc->kill (9); return threads->wait() - ({-1}); ...the verify process hung... The only reason what I may think of is dependency on PID generation order (this is, actually, only visible change - previously, I compiled and verified pike installation on same computer without any problems, and when I disable randomized PIDs, this test passes quickly). NB: after some time, it fails with: [WATCHDOG] Pike testsuite timeout, sending SIGABRT. Any ideas how to make it independent from PIDs? :) Regards, /Al

3 4

GTK detection broken?
by Anders Johansson `(Roxen IS) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 15 Mar '04

15 Mar '04

Last checkin in 7.4/src/post_modules/GTK/configure.in seem to disable GTK support on a lot of platforms (all?) with "linking failed, erranous installation?".

2 2

GTK2
by Mikael Brandström 14 Mar '04

14 Mar '04

Is anyone working/planning anything for GTK2-support in Pike? cheers, Mikael

2 2

7.4 broken
by Jonas Walld�n ＠ Pike developers forum 13 Mar '04

13 Mar '04

Apparently this is not a good day to recompile one's 7.4 tree. The check-ins from last night break my installation, and Xenofarm displays yellow or red for most machines. Running pike --features was the quickest way to get an error (although Tools.Install.features() works).

2 1

SSL problem
by Bill Welliver 12 Mar '04

12 Mar '04

I've got a problem with SSL in 7.5. I get a mac verification failure when running an sslport. Any idea what might be going on? I'm pretty sure the other end is not a problem, as it's a pretty well known service that's trying to make the connection (paypal). I've included a copy of the relevent debug output, attached below. Any ideas what might be going on? (this is a recent checkout, maybe from yesterday). Bill SSL.packet->recv: received version 3.1 packet Decrypting packet.. version[1]=1 SSL.connection: received packet of type 22 client_key_exchange server_derive_master_secret: ke_method 1 encrypted premaster_secret: "\0@;\262\375\4\366\310\334\262\343\337\214\272o\205>\224\37\375\3n\31\n\223Xb{vW\375;\356\345?m)\240""4\266\315d\17p1\206\177{4g\374 \274\310\n}L\27N?\311\36V5\371\350" premaster_secret: "\3\1\231\37G\3\353\214\371\27\"\\U\226x\343\37\371a>7\264Xu\323H\a\27\34D\304hb\364\303\321g\244\201\234DM\233\304\331\266\fa" SSL.handshake: Newer version detected in key exchange message. master: "\1yER\251""8*\371Xu\310\255\311\375.\241\6\372?WxK;:k\365\316]\241\272\343~[`B\234&\377\372w\320*\t\265T\a\3M" key_block: "T\354""1\261;\315\257LH0D\255\242c\211\23@\212\37\222`\\\214`|Gu\261i.\37\f|\4p@\316\346@\34A` b\203\373\211<\1\311E}\356\356\21LH\223z\345?\33\351\35S\201=:\27i{\247\235F\302$\262%'r\0\31v\371\37\321\364\247" client_random: "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\367_0\300}\367\225x%\271*\16\4E>\203" server_random: "@Py\351\340\234i7\316\247\246R5\300\"\240\302qw\25\4\242\220\223\333\225\322\261\275\344\306\340" client_write_MAC_secret: len:20 type:0 54 ec 31 b1 3b cd af 4c 48 30 44 ad a2 63 89 13 40 8a 1f 92 server_write_MAC_secret: len:20 type:0 60 5c 8c 60 7c 47 75 b1 69 2e 1f 0c 7c 04 70 40 ce e6 40 1c keys[2]: len:16 type:0 41 60 20 62 83 fb 89 3c 01 c9 45 7d ee ee 11 4c keys[3]: len:16 type:0 48 93 7a e5 3f 1b e9 1d 53 81 3d 3a 17 69 7b a7 keys[4]: len:8 type:0 9d 46 c2 24 b2 25 27 72 keys[5]: len:8 type:0 00 19 76 f9 1f d1 f4 a7 certificate_state: 0 SSL.packet->recv: received version 3.1 packet Decrypting packet.. version[1]=1 SSL.connection: received packet of type 20 tried change_cipher: 0 SSL.packet->recv: received version 3.1 packet Decrypting packet.. version[1]=1 Failed MAC-verification!! SSL.connection: Bad received packet SSL.connection->send_packet: type 21, desc 20, pri 1, "\2\24"

4 6

const
by Mirar ＠ Pike developers forum 11 Mar '04

11 Mar '04

t[iny]cc says, /home/mirar/pike/src/modules/HTTPLoop/accept_and_parse.c:550: cannot cast 'const struct svalue' to 'struct svalue' I assume this is because, 550: assign_svalue_no_free(sp++, &arg->args); #define assign_svalue_no_free_unlocked(X,Y) do {\ struct svalue _tmp;\ > struct svalue *_to=(X);\ > const struct svalue *_from=(Y);\ check_type(_from->type); check_refs(_from);\ > *_to=_tmp=*_from;\ if(_tmp.type <= MAX_REF_TYPE) add_ref(_tmp.u.dummy);\ }while(0) it works if I remove the "const". But is it the correct solution? const in C confuses me.

3 3

FakeFile
by Martin Nilsson (saturator) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 10 Mar '04

10 Mar '04

How can I get a list of incompatibilities between two program types? More specifically I would like Stdio.FakeFile to be compatible with Stdio.File.

2 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel