Pike-devel

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

3041 discussions

Re: ADD_FUNCTION() macro on pike 7.5 ?
by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

>The recommended way about using pike -x module need some special >version of autoconf... that is *not* present on all target machines. You don't need to run autoconf on the target machine. Just run "pike -x module --autoconf" on a machine which has the appropriate autoconf version, and include the generated configure script in the distribution. pike -x module on the target machine will see that the configure script already exists and has a timestamp that is newer than configure.in, and it will not try to rerun autoconf. / Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) Previous text: >2004-03-29 19:11: >Subject: Re: ADD_FUNCTION() macro on pike 7.5 ? >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Le 29 mars 04, à 13:35, Martin Nilsson (provokatör) @ Pike (-) >developers forum a écrit : > >>> >>> but outside that, eg custom pike C modules made (hardly) by hand, the >>> .pmod is not automatically generated. >> >> Not if you use the correct build procedure (pike -x module) for >> external >> modules. > >The recommended way about using pike -x module need some special >version of autoconf... that is *not* present on all target machines. > >So wa have to make a stable way to make it. > >>> >>> This one is good.... but external (home made) modules are allways >>> dynamic modules (eg .so)... >> >> No. If the Pike can not handle dynamic modules (because it is not >> possible on that platform) you would compile pike with the external >> modules as static modules. > >So you have to recompile pike isn't it ? > >/Xavier >-- >Xavier Beaudouin - Unix System Administrator & Projects Leader. >President of Kazar Organization : http://www.kazar.net/ >Please visit http://caudium.net/, home of Caudium & Camas projects > > > > / Brevbäraren >

1 0

pike -t
by David Gourdelier 28 Mar '04

28 Mar '04

Hi, I have a strange problem with pike -t in 7.5 and Caudium. When I start Caudium with -t, I have the following error at compile time: /usr/local/pike/7.5.23/lib/modules/Protocols.pmod/HTTP.pmod/Session.pike:1005 Error: Cannot inherit program which is not fully compiled yet. The strange thing is that it doesn't happen if I do pike -t -e 'Protocols.HTTP.Session;' for example. There is a backtrace attached to this mail and as you can see the error is generated from Pike itself (compile_error). Do you have any ideas ? Thank you for your help. / David Gourdelier

1 0

7.5/7.7
by Martin Nilsson (saturator) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 25 Mar '04

25 Mar '04

There is a lot going on in the 7.5 CVS right now. I suggest that we make some sort of branching, either with CVS branches or simply make a copy of 7.5 to 7.7 so that we can get something stable enough for 7.6 as soon as possible. Do feedback.

13 27

Gmp.mpq
by Martin Nilsson (provokat�r) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 23 Mar '04

23 Mar '04

Gmp.mpq calls get_mpz_from_digits... > Gmp.mpq("1/3"); Invalid digits, cannot convert to Gmp.mpz. Unknown program: Gmp.mpq(0/1)->create("1/3") HilfeInput:1: HilfeInput()->___HilfeWrapper()

1 0

7.6
by Martin Nilsson (provokat�r) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 23 Mar '04

23 Mar '04

Great work grubba! I see the following blocker bugs. Please add your own. [ ] Fix dmalloc leak. [ ] Fix Windows java problem. [ ] Fix Windows dynamic load of the Image module (?) [ ] Verify the whole path from (make doc;make export) to make install. [ ] Get Windows packaging to work for 7.5. [ ] Write change log/release notes Now is really the time for last requests from Roxen, Caudium and Aido developers.

8 23

7.6
by Bill Welliver 22 Mar '04

22 Mar '04

Are we talking days, weeks or months before this 7.5/7.7 split? I've got a few non-core items that I think I (or others) need to address before 7.6: 1. Autodocs: there are a number of modules and or functions that aren't documented well or at all (the readline and termcap stuff comes to mind). Also, one of the biggest complaints about the modref is that there are so few examples. If everyone could just take an hour or two to document or expand the documentation for a few functions, it would be a great help. 2. Modules: is there a general feeling about how big a deal external modules are going to be for 7.6? Do we need to test the procedures out more, and have documentation about how developers/end users go about creating and installing them? Should I try to finish my "module grab and install" code? The "server side" of this is almost finished, but the client end is barely started. Anyone want to help out with this? Bill

3 5

cygwin days
by Martin Nilsson (provokat�r) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 21 Mar '04

21 Mar '04

I have successfully built Pike on cygwin. There are currently a few issues you have to get around. Pike doesn't support cygwin paths. If /cygdrive/x/foo gets handed to a file function it should instead use x:/foo (well, x:\foo). Could this be fixed in fdlib? Stdio.Terminfo can not decode the cygwin terminfo file. sizeof(strbuf)==sstr-2. mt_lock( &aap_timeout_mutex ); in HTTPLoop/accept_and_parse.c triggers some sort of thread bug during startup. Just build without HTTPLoop.

5 11

pikefarm problems on irix 6.2
by Martin Bähr 20 Mar '04

20 Mar '04

hi, looking at the results of pikefarm for my indy, it appears that the build process tries to do to many things at once and my machine can't cope with it. is there any way the build process can be made less taxing on the machine? there is hardly anything else running on it. greetings, martin.

5 10

cygwin days
by Martin Nilsson (provokat�r) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 20 Mar '04

20 Mar '04

1 0

cygwin days
by Martin Nilsson (provokat�r) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 20 Mar '04

20 Mar '04

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel