Pike-devel April 2003

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

11 participants
55 discussions

Autodoc
by Martin Nilsson (har bott i google) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 03 Apr '03

03 Apr '03

(Not that it matters. If you use @code you'll get a preformatted paragraph with your code, while @expr gives you something that looks like @tt.)

1 0

7.4.18
by Martin Nilsson (har bott i google) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 03 Apr '03

03 Apr '03

New release candidate is Pike 7.4.18. Unless someone has a problem with it I suggest it is released tomorrow.

1 0

Release time
by Johan Sundstr�m (folksk�dare) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 03 Apr '03

03 Apr '03

Still two checkins in 7.4 unaccounted for in CHANGES: http://pike.ida.liu.se/development/cvs/pike.xml?v=7.4&build=217&between=200… grubba?

2 2

... and thanks for all the fish
by Martin Baehr 03 Apr '03

03 Apr '03

enough is enough! i've had it! with pike: calendar failing, floatingpoint bugs, blocking i/o callbacks upgrading woes with caudium: php problems parser bugs entity problems licensing problems camas problems with roxen: mysql dependancy complex rxml classes with sTeam: confusing web interface problems with access to pike lack of good search facility complicated irc access complex xslt for webpages. supports to many protocols time to switch! to python: negative indices in arrays clear indenting syntax no more braces and brakets to apache: excellent php support no more rxml bussinessfriendly license plenty of webmailers to choose from to zope: cool leaders (hi paul) instant and easy websites. large user community. it was a fun ride and i enjoyed working with all of you, but now it's time to move on. greetings, martin. -- interested in doing python programming, zope/python training, zope/python and/or unix system administration anywhere in the world. -- junior python working in europe csl-gmbh.net programmer zope.org (www.archlab|(www|db).hb2).tuwien.ac.at unix bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at systemadministrator (stuts|black.linux-m68k).org is.(schon.org|root.at) Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/

8 16

SSL problems
by Alexander Demenshin 01 Apr '03

01 Apr '03

Hi there, I found that there is no way to enforce inquiry of client certificate, for instance. In particular, there is no variable "auth_level" in SSL.context class, but it is used in SSL.handshake. Obvious fix (adding this variable and setting it to AUTHLEVEL_ask) doesn't help much, though - certificate is not requested anyway (not properly, at least). Additional problem - server's request for certificate is not handled at all: "Certificate request not yet implemented." I do something wrong or? :) If not - is it planned to be fixed or it is better to use OpenSSL glue? Regards, /Al

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel April 2003