Hi all,
I'm new to this list. Restarted playing Hattrick yesterday and started using Mattricks today :D. I am using Python in everyday work, although mostly nuemrically. I'd really like to help out with the development, but this would be no sooner than in a month due to lack of time. For now, I signed up here - hope it's the right place!
Cheers, Silvere (WKS Silver)
Karol Langner ------------- Wroclaw, Poland langner@kn.pl ------------- Odense, Danemark langner@memphys.sdu.dk -------------
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:09:53PM +0100, Karol Langner wrote:
Hi all,
Hello.
I'm new to this list. Restarted playing Hattrick yesterday and started using Mattricks today :D.
That's really nice ;)
I am using Python in everyday work, although mostly nuemrically. I'd really like to help out with the development, but this would be no sooner than in a month due to lack of time.
Great... I'll hope that we could expect huge boost in developing Mattricks in a month ;) In fact, Mattricks is the fastest developed Hattrick application I've ever seen, but it doesn't mean that it can't be developed even faster ;)
For now, I signed up here - hope it's the right place!
Yep, that's the proper place. Nice to see another Polish user/developer of Mattricks ;)
regards fEnIo
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:09:53PM +0100, Karol Langner wrote:
Hi all,
Hello.
I'm new to this list. Restarted playing Hattrick yesterday and started using Mattricks today :D.
That's really nice ;)
Indeed it is.
I am using Python in everyday work, although mostly nuemrically. I'd really like to help out with the development, but this would be no sooner than in a month due to lack of time.
Great... I'll hope that we could expect huge boost in developing Mattricks in a month ;)
That would be great, yes.
In fact, Mattricks is the fastest developed Hattrick application I've ever seen, but it doesn't mean that it can't be developed even faster ;)
I've too much free time it seems.
I've been messing around with the homepage today and hopefully it looks nicer and works better in IE too.
On a side-note:
I want someone (Kent?) to take some nice screenshots of mattricks running on Mac OS X. There is a header for them on the homepage but no actual screenshots.
/Ragnar
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:40:56PM +0100, Ragnar Ouchterlony wrote:
I've been messing around with the homepage today and hopefully it looks nicer and works better in IE too.
Yep, I've been watching progress almost all the time, and it works now better in MozillaFirebird too.
CSS is much better now.
regards fEnIo
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:40:56PM +0100, Ragnar Ouchterlony wrote:
I've been messing around with the homepage today and hopefully it looks nicer and works better in IE too.
Yep, I've been watching progress almost all the time, and it works now better in MozillaFirebird too.
CSS is much better now.
Yep, and I've learned quite a bit about CSS on the way (such as how to avoid IE bugs and poorly implemented CSS). It also seems to work reasonably well on all major (recent) browsers (netscape 4.x users not included). It works well in the text-based browser w3m too. :)
/Ragnar
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:53:53PM +0100, Ragnar Ouchterlony wrote:
I've been messing around with the homepage today and hopefully it looks nicer and works better in IE too.
Yep, I've been watching progress almost all the time, and it works now better in MozillaFirebird too.
CSS is much better now.
Yep, and I've learned quite a bit about CSS on the way (such as how to avoid IE bugs and poorly implemented CSS). It also seems to work reasonably well on all major (recent) browsers (netscape 4.x users not included). It works well in the text-based browser w3m too. :)
I've learned about CSS when I was making my own page ;)
Ok so now I've got some problematic issue. What about plural forms and declination issues?
I've got problems with date (near information about numbers of visitors) and with alternative texts on flags.
Do you intend to use language names in some other places? If not then I could change it to dative.
Problem with date isn't as easly solvable. The best way would be to have names of months in other format too.
regards fEnIo
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:53:53PM +0100, Ragnar Ouchterlony wrote:
I've been messing around with the homepage today and hopefully it looks nicer and works better in IE too.
Yep, I've been watching progress almost all the time, and it works now better in MozillaFirebird too.
CSS is much better now.
Yep, and I've learned quite a bit about CSS on the way (such as how to avoid IE bugs and poorly implemented CSS). It also seems to work reasonably well on all major (recent) browsers (netscape 4.x users not included). It works well in the text-based browser w3m too. :)
I've learned about CSS when I was making my own page ;)
Ok so now I've got some problematic issue. What about plural forms and declination issues?
I have tried using whole phrases as much as possible to avoid such things, even if there are some places that might need it.
I've got problems with date (near information about numbers of visitors) and with alternative texts on flags.
Do you intend to use language names in some other places? If not then I could change it to dative.
No, I do not intend to use them anywhere else.
Problem with date isn't as easly solvable. The best way would be to have names of months in other format too.
You have different inflections for months? What forms do you have (i.e. is it the same as for with ordinary plural forms in Polish? I could make a whole plural form code thing like there is for gettext. Not today though, I think, today I'm going to debug the MatchViewer.
/Ragnar
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:40:01AM +0100, Ragnar Ouchterlony wrote:
I've got problems with date (near information about numbers of visitors) and with alternative texts on flags.
Do you intend to use language names in some other places? If not then I could change it to dative.
No, I do not intend to use them anywhere else.
Ok, so this is fixed now.
Problem with date isn't as easly solvable. The best way would be to have names of months in other format too.
You have different inflections for months? What forms do you have (i.e. is it the same as for with ordinary plural forms in Polish? I could make a whole plural form code thing like there is for gettext. Not today though, I think, today I'm going to debug the MatchViewer.
We've got seven instances of nouns. If I have to say normally date then it's " 3 luty 2004 " But when I have to say that page has been view [] since [date] then it should be " 3 lutego 2004 ".
Maybe you want to show you another instances? ;) If I would like to say that I'll go on vacation on February, then it should be " w lutym ". That's one of reason why Polish language isn't the simplest one ;)
Conclusion. It would be nice to have two versions of names of months. I don't suspect, that more formats of dates will be used on homepage. But these two are being used now.
regards fEnIo
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
We've got seven instances of nouns. If I have to say normally date then it's " 3 luty 2004 " But when I have to say that page has been view [] since [date] then it should be " 3 lutego 2004 ".
Maybe you want to show you another instances? ;) If I would like to say that I'll go on vacation on February, then it should be " w lutym ". That's one of reason why Polish language isn't the simplest one ;)
Conclusion. It would be nice to have two versions of names of months. I don't suspect, that more formats of dates will be used on homepage. But these two are being used now.
Now I see what you mean. You are referring to the "Paged viewed 17 times since February the 3rd in the year of 2004? This is an internal feature of the Roxen webserver (this webserver is used on lysator) we use for counting the visitors. It isn't solvable by me, you would need to complain with the makers of the webserver.
/Ragnar
mattricks@lists.lysator.liu.se
-
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo -
Karol Langner -
Ragnar Ouchterlony