Johan Sundstr?m (Achtung Liebe!) @ ChiliMoon (-) Mooh, mooh wrote:

...

One final question here; would anybody object to actually picking my current SVN/SVK repository as master for the ChiliMoon sources?

I think that would be great. If and when the time comes for migrating

Ok, I'm setting up things now then. If anybody objects, he'd better hurry :-).

UI, it might be worth testing some alternative; the demos I've seen of Chora for instance (http://freshmeat.net/projects/chora/), isn't tenth as bad as ViewCVS.

Quite so. I'll leave this as an exercise to the reader for now. Especially since you can mirror the SVK repository and test it locally (without going over the Internet).

Besides, actually having a live svn repository might encourage people to upgrade code librarian all the way to supporting subversion. (Not sure if I'll have the time myself, but it's more likely than if there is no present need for it.)

Quite right. It never hurts to tickle some interest.

The same probably applies to the Pike site and repository, eventually. Will there be a read-only subversion tree open for Pike, that we can point to from the site (noting details such as how often it is synced et cetera)?

I'm making read-only versions of Pike and Roxen available; synced at least every night, possibly even every hour (I have to check what kind of load it creates).

The nice thing about the Roxen SVN I'm making available is that it is completely linked with the ChiliMoon repository. ChiliMoon will be read-only for all, and read-write only for developers, of course.