I'd like to do away with the global fd-to-backend mapping. One part of this is to use a better interface for multi-backend aware code (i.e. the files and Shuffler modules afaics). The other is to dumb down the old-style register-and-query-callbacks-through-fd's interface to only access the default backend (i.e. to how it was before multiple backends were introduced).
Opinions? Grubba? Is there more multi-backend aware code than the standard files module and Shuffler?
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
Previous text:
2004-04-02 20:52: Subject: leak
Ah, yes. I'm working on that.
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
I'd like to do away with the global fd-to-backend mapping. One part of this is to use a better interface for multi-backend aware code (i.e. the files and Shuffler modules afaics). The other is to dumb down the old-style register-and-query-callbacks-through-fd's interface to only access the default backend (i.e. to how it was before multiple backends were introduced).
Sounds reasonable.
Opinions? Grubba? Is there more multi-backend aware code than the standard files module and Shuffler?
Not that I know of.
/ Henrik Grubbström (Lysator)
Previous text:
2004-04-02 21:46: Subject: leak
I'd like to do away with the global fd-to-backend mapping. One part of this is to use a better interface for multi-backend aware code (i.e. the files and Shuffler modules afaics). The other is to dumb down the old-style register-and-query-callbacks-through-fd's interface to only access the default backend (i.e. to how it was before multiple backends were introduced).
Opinions? Grubba? Is there more multi-backend aware code than the standard files module and Shuffler?
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se