Hmmmm... on the other hand.. when the .so file doesn't get the underscore prefix, how do I inherit it in my module.pmod when the dir structure becomes:

Public.pmod/ Lang.pmod/ Lua.so Lua.pmod/ module.pmod

if I do: inherit Public.Lang.Lua; what am I inheriting... ?

Kaos wrote:

Disregard this. I got another error mixed up with this one.. (@module@ mentioned earlier).. I suppose the prefix has been removed in the 7.7 branch?

Kaos wrote:

...

I'm having trouble with the .so not getting the __ prefix - anyone else know about this? About to compile a new 7.6 and test with that as well..

Well, since both are presumable modules (and not classes), you're shooting yourself in the foot and probably inherits master()->Joinnode.

Why are you inheriting a .pmod?

.so modules are always modules to some degree; they can "be" something else but only through a magic identifier (_module_value, iirc), so in the case of that happening in the .so file (or the .pmod, which I actually think works too) you would inherit whatever that value points to in the resulting Joinnode.

/ Mirar

Previous text:

2004-10-14 18:55: Subject: Re: pike -x module install (7.7)

---

Hmmmm... on the other hand.. when the .so file doesn't get the underscore prefix, how do I inherit it in my module.pmod when the dir structure becomes:

Public.pmod/ Lang.pmod/ Lua.so Lua.pmod/ module.pmod

if I do: inherit Public.Lang.Lua; what am I inheriting... ?

Kaos wrote:

...

Disregard this. I got another error mixed up with this one.. (@module@ mentioned earlier).. I suppose the prefix has been removed in the 7.7 branch?

Kaos wrote:

...

I'm having trouble with the .so not getting the __ prefix - anyone else know about this? About to compile a new 7.6 and test with that as well..

/ Brevbäraren

I've seen dirnode's and joinnode's some when goofing around with hilfe, but can't really say I've grasped the ins and outs of it just yet :P

Well, they exist to solve two problems; for when a module is in two places (joinnode then) and for when a module is a directory (dirnode, for instance Protocols is a typical dirnode).

The module.pmod thing for dirnodes is an afterconstruct, I think, and then the dirnode will just join up with that module.pmod as well (but without the joinnode, I think).

/ Mirar

Previous text:

2004-10-15 10:00: Subject: Re: pike -x module install (7.7)

---

Ah, maybe I don't have to inherit the .so when I don't have the ___ prefix... ? :) have to try that It's from the idea that there's a __Foo.so and a module.pmod that inherits from the .so file to place it in the module path in pike, and make all the stuff in __Foo.so accessible as Foo.

I've seen dirnode's and joinnode's some when goofing around with hilfe, but can't really say I've grasped the ins and outs of it just yet :P

Thanks

Mirar @ Pike developers forum wrote:

...

Well, since both are presumable modules (and not classes), you're shooting yourself in the foot and probably inherits master()->Joinnode.

Why are you inheriting a .pmod?

.so modules are always modules to some degree; they can "be" something else but only through a magic identifier (_module_value, iirc), so in the case of that happening in the .so file (or the .pmod, which I actually think works too) you would inherit whatever that value points to in the resulting Joinnode.

/ Mirar

Previous text:

...

2004-10-14 18:55: Subject: Re: pike -x module install (7.7)

---

Hmmmm... on the other hand.. when the .so file doesn't get the underscore prefix, how do I inherit it in my module.pmod when the dir structure becomes:

Public.pmod/ Lang.pmod/ Lua.so Lua.pmod/ module.pmod

if I do: inherit Public.Lang.Lua; what am I inheriting... ?

Kaos wrote:

...

Disregard this. I got another error mixed up with this one.. (@module@ mentioned earlier).. I suppose the prefix has been removed in the 7.7 branch?

Kaos wrote:

...

I'm having trouble with the .so not getting the __ prefix - anyone else know about this? About to compile a new 7.6 and test with that as well..

/ Brevbäraren

/ Brevbäraren