Sure, but this is supposed to be a master thesis work. Just adding wrappers to existing datatypes seem more like a weekend's work, or less. So I wondered if there was something more to it than it seemed from the description Peta just gave.
/ Leif Stensson, Lysator
Previous text:
2002-10-28 18:54: Subject: Re: Proposal for new ADT interface
Isn't the point to build a base standard, to later extend it with other abstract datatypes?
/ Brevbäraren
I thought he was designing an API, not making wrappers.
/ Martin Nilsson (Fake Build Master)
Previous text:
2002-10-28 19:30: Subject: Re: Proposal for new ADT interface
Sure, but this is supposed to be a master thesis work. Just adding wrappers to existing datatypes seem more like a weekend's work, or less. So I wondered if there was something more to it than it seemed from the description Peta just gave.
/ Leif Stensson, Lysator
The goal is to add new ADTs to Pike, but since the new ADTs should be apart of a library with generic algorithms and function obejcts, i belive it has to be a common interface to the ADTs. The main goal is still to implement new ADTs, a few of them just wrappers around the existing ones, and at least two new, binary tree and a new queue. Apart from this there will also be a design of how the algorithms should be built and, if there is time, implemention of one, probably a divide & conquer.
/ Peta, jo det är jag
Previous text:
2002-10-28 19:30: Subject: Re: Proposal for new ADT interface
Sure, but this is supposed to be a master thesis work. Just adding wrappers to existing datatypes seem more like a weekend's work, or less. So I wondered if there was something more to it than it seemed from the description Peta just gave.
/ Leif Stensson, Lysator
pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se
-
Leif Stensson, Lysator ＠ Pike developers forum -
Martin Nilsson (Fake Build Master) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum
-
Peta, jo det �r jag ＠ Pike developers forum