I've prepared a beta release of 7.6 that contains all of the fixes from the past few years, up through last week. Sadly, it doesn't contain the clang patch that was just committed by mc, but I think it wouldn't have made a big difference in overall clang compatibility. I realize that many people have moved on from 7.6, but there are a number of fixes that would be good to get out, especially for those folks running web servers using pike.
Notes: I didn't update the change log, and the export script hasn't been updated for git.
http://pike.ida.liu.se/pub/pike/beta/7.6.128/Pike-v7.6.128.tar.gz
As always, comments and suggestions are welcome.
Best,
Bill
I've prepared a beta release of 7.6 that contains all of the fixes from the past few years, up through last week. Sadly, it doesn't contain the clang patch that was just committed by mc, but I think it wouldn't have made a big difference in overall clang compatibility. I realize that many people have moved on from 7.6, but there are a number of fixes that would be good to get out, especially for those folks running web servers using pike.
Notes: I didn't update the change log, and the export script hasn't been updated for git.
Whee! Great!
http://pike.ida.liu.se/pub/pike/beta/7.6.128/Pike-v7.6.128.tar.gz
I've now added a corresponding tentative ebuild to the pike overlay for Gentoo.
/grubba
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 02:05:46AM -0400, H. William Welliver III wrote:
I've prepared a beta release of 7.6 that contains all of the fixes from the past few years, up through last week. Sadly, it doesn't contain the clang patch that was just committed by mc, but I think it wouldn't have made a big difference in overall clang compatibility. I realize that many people have moved on from 7.6, but there are a number of fixes that would be good to get out, especially for those folks running web servers using pike.
Notes: I didn't update the change log, and the export script hasn't been updated for git.
http://pike.ida.liu.se/pub/pike/beta/7.6.128/Pike-v7.6.128.tar.gz
this still needs an older version for nettle, is that correct? how do i get it to build witht the bundled nettle?
i thought that would happen automatically if nettle is not installed.
greetings, martin.
Just wanted to confirm that I've reproduced the problem on OSX; it seems that the bundle is enabled, and it is built, but for some reason configure hasn't added the bundle install directory build/$(OS)/bundles to the appropriate compiler variables (-I, -L, etc). The configure script looks okay, but it doesn't seem to have the desired effect.
doing a
LDFLAGS="-L$BUNDLE_DIR/lib -R$BUNDLE_DIR/lib" LDDFLAGS="-L$BUNDLE_DIR/lib -R$BUNDLE_DIR/lib" CFLAGS="-I$BUNDLE_DIR/include" make
seems to make everything work properly (which, incidentally, is exactly what the configure script does).
I suspect this was a problem with 7.6.112, as well, though I don't have an immediate solution to the problem.
Bill
On Oct 11, 2012, at 5:20 AM, Martin Bähr mbaehr@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
how do i get it to build witht the bundled nettle?
i thought that would happen automatically if nettle is not installed.
greetings, martin.
pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se
-
H. William Welliver III -
Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum -
Martin Bähr