Actually the real call is ({ i, o })(fun) and it could be that fun be 0 in some cases but it could be another thing too.

How does it matter what fun is? Regardless it'd try to call `() in the two objects, and it doesn't exist.

Anyway, the problem is that I made mega_apply a little more picky about trying to call things that aren't callable. That made call_function more picky which in turn made map more picky. I'll fix map. Can you check in a test case with this?

/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS

Previous text:

2004-04-06 14:29: Subject: Re: Cannot call undefined lfun

---

Martin Nilsson (provokatör) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:

...

What are you trying to do? ({ i, o })(0); ?

Actually the real call is ({ i, o })(fun) and it could be that fun be 0 in some cases but it could be another thing too. If it's 0, it closes the port. But with 7.2 it didn't produce such an error when fun is 0.

...

/ Martin Nilsson (provokatör)

Previous text:

...

2004-04-06 14:10: Subject: Cannot call undefined lfun

---

Hi,

I got a problem with Pike 7.5 that I don't have with older Pike (at least on 7.2):

Pike v7.5 release 23 running Hilfe v3.5 (Incremental Pike Frontend)

...

object i = Stdio.Port(8080), o = Stdio.Port(8081); i;

(1) Result: Stdio.Port(ANY:8080)

...

o;

(2) Result: Stdio.Port(ANY:8081)

...

Array.map(({ i, o }), 0);

Cannot call undefined lfun `(). HilfeInput:1: HilfeInput()->___HilfeWrapper()

Is it a bug in Pike ?

/ David

/ Brevbäraren

/ Brevbäraren