On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 15:59:01 +0200, Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum 10353@lyskom.lysator.liu.se wrote:
So I interpret this as "ure3" (whatever that is) being the thing we actually want, not this garbage fire?
On https://branchfree.org/2019/02/28/paper-hyperscan-a-fast-multi-pattern-regex... the author in the commets writes on March 27, 2019:
""" I would like “ure3” to be open. I also will need help. I designed Hyperscan but did not build it all by myself; [...]
If I build a new regex matching system it will be a lot smaller and simpler, but it will still be a huge effort. """
And on April 15, 2019: """ if I get to it. """
So well, given the fact that the "ure3" doesn't exist, I doubt it is something we should or even could want.
br, tj.
You can still want things which do not exist. :-) But given the attitude of the author I don't expect I'll be wanting either that or hyperscan. If _you_ want something which is only of interest to "network [companies] looking to scan 5,000 complex regexes in streaming mode" (who does that?), feel free to integrate it, but keep it on Monger please.
pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se