Come to think of it, private might be right anyway. Of course one may subclass and override, but that is only because the private methods and classes does not exists (well, they aren't visible anyway) in the subclass. If the intention is to create a class that should only be accessible from your code and never used by subclasses, I would go for private.
Anyway, the modifiers in pike are somewhat confusing if you try to apply knowledge from some other language to them...
/ Marcus Agehall (nu med semester)
Previous text:
2004-07-22 07:57: Subject: Re: Access control
Marcus Agehall (nu med semester) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:
Ah, that is true.
/ Marcus Agehall (nu med semester)
Previous text:
2004-07-20 16:22: Subject: Access control
private is almost never right, since you can inherit and modify then.
/ Martin Nilsson (DivX Networks)
Thanks, I'll look what I get with different attributes.
//Andreas
/ Brevbäraren
pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se