PIKEFUN int `[](mixed index) { struct svalue *s;

simple_array_index_no_free(s, THIS->a, index);

^ Here's your problem; this is C, not C++. The concept of implicitly passing arguments by reference doesn't exist.

Try something like:

PIKEFUN int `[](mixed index) { struct svalue sval;

simple_array_index_no_free(&sval, THIS->a, index);

instead.

/ Henrik Grubbström (Lysator)

Previous text:

2003-01-09 14:54: Subject: simple_array_index_no_free

---

I'm trying to get the value for an index in a array and use simple_array_index_no_free but only manage to make a coredump. I guess i could have something with the stack to do since when I run a test program like this.

int main() { array a = ({3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11}); Test.ArrayAdapter ad = Test.ArrayAdapter(a); write(sprintf("array %d adapter %d\r\n", a[1], ad[1])); for (int n=0; n< 9; n++) { write(sprintf("array %d adapter %d\r\n", a[n], ad[n])); } }

It will produce a coredump. But if replace the ad[1] with ad[1]=11 then it will work.

Does anyone have a idea what I've forgotten? Or is simple_array_index_no_free the wrong way to go? Greatfull for any help. Code follows...

DECLARATIONS

PIKECLASS ArrayAdapter {

CVAR int pos; CVAR struct array *a;

PIKEFUN int `[](mixed index) { struct svalue *s;

simple_array_index_no_free(s, THIS->a, index);

if (s) { push_svalue(s); } else { push_int(0); Pike_sp[-1].subtype=NUMBER_UNDEFINED; } }

PIKEFUN int `[]=(mixed index, mixed value) { simple_set_index(THIS->a, index, value); }

PIKEFUN void create(array a) { add_ref(THIS->a=a); }

INIT { THIS->a=0; THIS->pos=0; }

EXIT { free_array(THIS->a); }

}

/ Peta, jo det är jag

The way simple_array_index_no_free handles a string index is.. umm.. creative. I wonder why it doesn't treat arrays the same way, but most of all I wonder why it exists at all.

/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS

Previous text:

2003-01-09 14:54: Subject: simple_array_index_no_free

---

I'm trying to get the value for an index in a array and use simple_array_index_no_free but only manage to make a coredump. I guess i could have something with the stack to do since when I run a test program like this.

int main() { array a = ({3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11}); Test.ArrayAdapter ad = Test.ArrayAdapter(a); write(sprintf("array %d adapter %d\r\n", a[1], ad[1])); for (int n=0; n< 9; n++) { write(sprintf("array %d adapter %d\r\n", a[n], ad[n])); } }

It will produce a coredump. But if replace the ad[1] with ad[1]=11 then it will work.

Does anyone have a idea what I've forgotten? Or is simple_array_index_no_free the wrong way to go? Greatfull for any help. Code follows...

DECLARATIONS

PIKECLASS ArrayAdapter {

CVAR int pos; CVAR struct array *a;

PIKEFUN int `[](mixed index) { struct svalue *s;

simple_array_index_no_free(s, THIS->a, index);

if (s) { push_svalue(s); } else { push_int(0); Pike_sp[-1].subtype=NUMBER_UNDEFINED; } }

PIKEFUN int `[]=(mixed index, mixed value) { simple_set_index(THIS->a, index, value); }

PIKEFUN void create(array a) { add_ref(THIS->a=a); }

INIT { THIS->a=0; THIS->pos=0; }

EXIT { free_array(THIS->a); }

}

/ Peta, jo det är jag