Hi there,

Just found another bug(?) - the construction like: int ts = time() + 10; while (time() < ts) /* nothing */ ; is wrongly optimized - it doesn't work as expected, i.e. the loop is bypassed - so virtually there is no delay.

When I change it to 'while ((n = time()) < ts);' or put something in body, it works. Checked against one day old CVS Pike 7.4 (7.4.17). NB: Is it related to time() only or? :)

Regards, /Al