I see Nilssons latest changes has broken the #if constant check again. Is it intentional since there still seems to be a difference in opinion on that, or is it just a confused attempt to make the warning at master.pike:586 optional?
In 7.6, the errors for placeholders also are relegated to warnings. Nilsson, can you explain that?
Btw, I applaud the initiative to add Pike_vsnprintf. The implementation is a bit simplistic, but it's a start. It does handle wide strings correctly, doesn't it?
I'm not at home so I can't check the code right now.
/ Martin Nilsson (räfsfiskal)
Previous text:
2004-07-02 20:01: Subject: #if constant again
I see Nilssons latest changes has broken the #if constant check again. Is it intentional since there still seems to be a difference in opinion on that, or is it just a confused attempt to make the warning at master.pike:586 optional?
In 7.6, the errors for placeholders also are relegated to warnings. Nilsson, can you explain that?
Btw, I applaud the initiative to add Pike_vsnprintf. The implementation is a bit simplistic, but it's a start. It does handle wide strings correctly, doesn't it?
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se
-
Martin Nilsson (r�fsfiskal) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum -
Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS ＠ Pike developers forum