Re: OpenSSL wrapper vs Pike's SSL (Was: Bz2)

Why not? I really think it is.

And you don't really need to be able to pass *String objects around to each and every C-function that want a string.

But it would be quite useful if, say, read and write at least handled them. And the low-level crypto methods.

Doing so is very easy if my suggestion about the internal structure is used.

All functions using get_all_args and .cmod:s could easily be fixed to handle them without any changes to the actual functions (at least not any major changes).

/ Per Hedbor ()

Previous text:

2003-01-30 16:03: Subject: Re: OpenSSL wrapper vs Pike's SSL (Was: Bz2)

---

But it's still not worth the effort, is it?

/ Martin Nilsson (Åskblod)