31 May
2007
31 May
'07
3:35 a.m.
good point. i have been thinking about such a special function to test errors, as it could throw if the test fails, although this doesn't work if you want to handle multiple errors seperately.
for that a new syntax like try,catch,finally seems to be the best option. (anyone willing/able to comment on how much work that would be?
greetings, martin.