Le Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum a...:
How did you go about trying to add that workaround then? The configure script uses "gnome-config --cflags ..." to get the CFLAGS to use during the configure checks. Isn't gnome-config broken if it leaves out necessary header paths?
kiwi@kiwi:~$ gnome-config --cflags gnome -I/usr/X11R6/include/gnome-1.0 -I/usr/X11R6/include -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H -I/usr/X11R6/lib/gnome-libs/include -I/usr/X11R6/include/gtk12 -I/usr/local/include/glib12 -I/usr/local/include
It seems to give the correct flags, but configure doesn't seems to add it... :/
Previous text:
2002-10-20 00:30: Subject: no gnome.h & freebsd
Howdy,
FreeBSD has a strange place to handle gnome 1.0 headers. I've tryed to add a workaround in the configure.in of src/post_modules/GTK but it seems that REALLY_CHECK_HEADER() doesn't take care of new include path.
Is there any good way to handle that ?
/Xavier
-- Xavier Beaudouin - Unix System Administrator & Projects Leader. For mail address, please check header of these mails. Spams are not accepted. Caudium: http://caudium.net/, CAMAS webmail: http://camas.caudium.net/ Making friends with FreeBSD: Just because the system has panicked doesn`t mean that you should panic too.
/ Brevbäraren